Replying to @seconds_0
Man itâs like every day I see a dunk and itâs a sub 200 word tweet and Iâm like đ¤ˇ
Replying to @GuzzleGuinness
Starting to think the experiment is the âresultsâ you see after. Who prefers the thing at the bottom here?
Replying to @dj_berry11
The song from space war still lives in my head, but I think it was from Cartoon Sushi, not so much liquid Tv: youtu.be/lH1EdZIz21o?si=-zGlâŚ
Iâm looking at your novel. Did you invent post apocalyptic prep as a genre? Is this the first story with an ex soldier confronting communal living and a return after war? What did you do that wasnât algorithmic?
I at least have the humility to say almost nothing I write is new.
Replying to @Wigglenator @SHL0MS
It wonât be long. This is Sterling Crispinâs work, using GPT3, so five years ago. Pretty sure itâs a trivial process to make something like this work acrylics and we get to have this conversation all over again.
Replying to @omegatheta @JoeDotAverage
Itâs a legit Monet. Itâs just a slightly obscure one. Your compatriots contorted themselves to demonstrate how they could find a pattern that doesnât exist.
The best argument against your pattern matching is finding it when it isnât there.
Itâs not though. Thereâs a director attached. No, English isnât machine language, you can read it.
Shortcuts: you still painting on cellulose nitrate then? No morphing keyframes? Be a shame if you touched a shortcut branded by Adobe.
Replying to @NateSilver538
Itâs still directed by a human. Is your complaint with the art assets or that.












