아랑 retweeted
考察というか、事実を教えます。
あなたが求めているのはヒーローではなくDV彼氏です。
もっと嫌味な言い方をすると、「自分の味方でいてくれる殺人鬼」をあなたは求めています。
これは典型的な、DV男がモテる理屈を支える女性心理なんですよ。
なぜDV男がモテるかというと、その暴力性が自分に向くまでは「頼り甲斐のある男」という見え方をしてしまうからです。
理性的に判断すれば、周囲へ暴力性を振りまいている時点でやべぇ奴なのですが、女性心理ではその暴力が「あたしを守るため」に振るわれていると、正しい暴力に見える傾向があります。その暴力性が自分に向くことなんて予想しないんです。このお姫様心理が、男性と比べると女性に多いという傾向があります。
一般的なヒーロー作品のヒーローは、善悪を判断して、悪を成敗します。ヒーローたちは敵を殴り倒し、時に殺していますが、それは敵が悪だからです。
さて現実、あなたの言う司法や産婦人科医やサッカー選手は、悪となってないんですよ。不起訴や無罪なんですもの。
あなた個人の好き嫌いでは悪かもしれませんが、法治国家である日本で、悪となってないんです。なのに、それを殴り倒してくれる人を求めてるんですよね？でも、それを殴り倒すのって単なる無法者の仕業でしかないんですよ。ヒーローではありません。
あなたの嫌いな人をたまたま殴ってくれただけの通り魔ですよ。通り魔が好きなんですか？
그거 돌려 받으려면 루브르 대개방 해야 하는데? ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
En Europe, quand on retrouve un tableau volé par les nazis pendant la guerre, on le rend immédiatement aux familles. Si un musée osait l'exposer fièrement, ce serait un scandale d'État.
Mais je viens de découvrir un truc complètement fou sur le Japon.
Pendant l'invasion de la Chine, l'armée japonaise a pillé plus de 3,6 millions de reliques culturelles et de livres anciens. Aujourd'hui encore, plus de 1 000 trésors nationaux chinois (des stèles impériales, des statues millénaires) sont exposés tranquillement dans les musées nationaux de Tokyo, comme s'ils les avaient achetés aux enchères.
Pas d'excuses. Pas de restitution. Rien.
En tant que Français, je me demande vraiment : comment un pays peut-il se vanter d'être "raffiné et respectueux" tout en gardant des objets volés dans le sang dans ses vitrines ?
3
160
아랑 retweeted
Are you seriously about to try and pretend black people weren't the ones making this a problem to begin with? Literally ALL you guys yap about is your own skin color. It's fucking weird and frankly PATHETIC
아랑 retweeted
It's really funny because Anime is generally really REALLY obvious when the character they have is meant to be "white" white in an non-euro inspired setting
넛지의 가장 가까운 예시는 소변기 속 벌 스티커.
이상한 곳에 싸지 말고 여기 조준하라고.
기법상으로 보면 이런 방식을 ‘넛지(Nudge)’라고 하는데요.
사람에게 특정한 행동을 강요하지 않으면서도 선택이 이루어지는 환경을 만들어 자연스럽게 행동을 유도하는 방식입니다.
넛지 자체는 잘 알려진 기법이지만, 닌텐도가 실제 사용자의 마음과 상황을 세심하게 헤아려 제품 포장에 적용했다는 점이 중요합니다.
원글에서 말씀하신 것처럼 사용자의 입장에서 충분히 고민하고 배려하지 않았다면 나오기 어려운 아이디어라고 생각합니다.
기법을 지식으로 알고 있는 것과 실제로 사용자의 입장에서 생각하고 적용하는 것은 또 다른 이야기니까요.
여러모로 배울 점도 많고 생각할 거리도 남겨주는 포스팅이네요.
1
91
아랑 retweeted
이런 사람들은 한국 아니 일본 지하철 화장실이라도 한번만 제발 써봤으면 좋겠음 공중 화장실이 쉣 상태인건 무료라서가 아니라 서양인들의 매너가 개똥이고, 공중화장실 관리가 전혀 안 되기 때문이란다 동양인들은 정부가 뺙세게 관리하지 않아도 알아서 깨끗하게 쓴단다...
One of the reasons I don’t like socialism is public bathrooms.
A public bathroom is about as basic a shared resource as you can get. Everyone gets to use it, and everyone is expected to show a little consideration for the next person. The rules aren’t particularly complicated.
And yet, a shocking number of adults can’t even manage to throw their paper towels in the trash. Some will pee all over a toilet seat and leave it for the next person. And the next person, who didn’t make the mess, certainly isn’t going to clean it up either.
Now imagine trusting these same people to collectively manage an entire economy.
We can’t even get everyone to agree that cleaning up their own pee is a personal responsibility, but somehow we’re supposed to believe everyone will become hardworking, responsible, and considerate when we’re sharing the fruits of each other’s labor.
Now, compare your average public restroom to a Buc-ee’s bathroom.
Buc-ee’s figured something out. Clean bathrooms attract customers. Customers spend money. So the company has a financial incentive to keep those bathrooms spotless. They hire people to maintain them, hold employees accountable, and compete for your business.
And people will literally plan their road trips around stopping there.
That’s capitalism. Someone recognized a problem, found a way to solve it, and made money because people valued the result.
Of course, not everyone contributes equally to society. Some people work harder, make better decisions, and take more responsibility. Others seem perfectly content making life more difficult for everyone around them.
I believe people should have the freedom to live however they choose. I also believe in helping people who genuinely need it.
But I have a hard time accepting an economic philosophy that expects me to trust everyone to act in the collective interest when some people can’t be bothered to clean up after themselves.
Buc-ee’s figured out how to get people to willingly pay for a better experience.
Socialism wants me to believe the people leaving paper towels on the floor will suddenly become responsible stewards of everyone else’s resources.
I’m going with the beaver.
