Publisher and THFC fan. I may have made remarks that I do not agree with.
Joined January 2010
- Tweets30.1K
- Following389
- Followers331
- Likes13.6K
My daughter starts a Sports Journalism degree in Sheffield tomorrow. Wow, she's going to experience some serious sporting pain right off the bat 😬
Er, that's not how economics works. I know this because I studied it. This guy sure as hell knows this. History is going to look very badly on him and this bunch of liars.
Fucking hell. I don't really post on her anymore, but this is so bat shit scary. The world is fucked
He doesn't respond to anyone who doesn't use the second G. Sorry Tristan, no dice 🎲
I wonder what @GreggAWallace did and who it pissed off.
This is not about inappropriate jokes or innuendo.
There must be more to it.
If you’d like to tell your story Andrew and I would be glad to host you Greg.
Tom Naysmith retweeted
“And which great efficiency expert will lead this important new effort to streamline?”
“Actually there will be two people in charge”
My kids used to love going when they were young. They called a guy who sat a few seats away "Mr sweary man" they thought he was hilarious. Golden rule was that they never used the swear words and don't tell Mum....
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Tom Naysmith retweeted
This is the Shadow Justice Secretary.
In his very first tweet in the role, he has chosen to lie to you.
Keir Starmer did not let Jason Hoganson out early. Hoganson was serving for domestic violence. DV is specifically excluded from the ‘release on 40% of sentence’ scheme that Starmer’s government has introduced.
As a result, he was released at 50% of sentence instead. Which has been the release provisions for quite some time.
Anyone want to guess whose party introduced 50% release?
These lying fuckers just cannot be trusted.
Meet Jason Hoganson.
Jason was jailed for hitting his ex-girlfriend. Keir Starmer let him out early.
Within hours of his release, the police got another call, saying he’d assaulted her yet again. Now he’s on the run.
Who could have seen that coming?
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Jason Hoganson was released at the half way point of his sentence. Releasing prisoners at 50% of sentence served was Conservative Party policy.
The early release scheme was brought in under the Conservative government due to lack of prison spaces
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
amp.theguardian.com/society/articl…
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
amp.theguardian.com/society/articl…
Will be funny to see how long it takes for RFK Jr and Elon Musk to realise they now have absolutely no influence over Trump 🤣
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Tom Naysmith retweeted
‘I was so rattled by the gift of a £10,000 watch that i couldn’t motivate myself for the biggest game of my club career four days later.’
After visiting Beijing last week, China's environmental policies are far more worrying than anything Trump is going to do
Tom Naysmith retweeted
⛔️ HELP: Police Still Concerned For The Whereabouts Of Missing Nigel Paul Farage.
👇Please like and share this #BrokenNews to help with the search this #SaturdayMorning.
Tom Naysmith retweeted
Wow, Musk's lawyers openly admit in court that he was flagrantly lying about the $1 million giveaway, saying they choose the winners based on "suitability" and absurdly claiming it's actually a "salary" to be a "spokesperson" for his cause.
from Philly courtroom —
Musk lawyer says his $1m giveaway is NOT a lottery. "There is no prize to be won" and winners "are not chosen at random," Musk lawyer Chris Gober said.
Instead, the $1m is a salary they "earn" to be a spokesperson for Musk's pro-Trump super PAC. Winners are picked based on their "suitability to serve" and their personal story, Gober said.
In response, Philly DA team called this a "complete admission of liability" that Musk is running an illegal lottery under PA law.
Remember: When Musk announced the giveaway.... in PA nonetheless.... he said, "we are going to be awarding $1 million randomly." DA showed this in court to the judge.
Gober argued there's a difference between "randomly" and "by chance," which is why he argued that this isn't an illegal lottery under PA gaming laws.
