Dave Mitchell, Stochastic Humorist retweeted
Voddie Baucham: If you don’t want Christian Nationalism what kind of government do you want?
Mark it down: The incoming Dem administration will drive out Elon and all those jobs. The Texafornia transformation is on its way.
Texas Gov.-elect Gina Hinojosa is asking state officials to pause land negotiations with Elon Musk's SpaceX.
She wants officials to hold off on taking any action involving the proposed deal until she takes office in January.
The land in question includes Boca Chica State Park, near SpaceX's Starbase facility in South Texas.
What.
WHAT.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 Official Election Administration and Voting Comprehensive Report buried all the way on page 193 of the document shows Texas processed 2,900,357 new valid voter registrations between 2022-2024 without proof of citizenship
Documented proof of citizenship like birth certificate, passport and naturalization papers is not required at the time of voter registration in Texas
56.5% of Texas voter registration were classified as “new valid registrations.”
This is extremely suspicious that 55% of Texas voter registrations were “new”
Look, I despised every one of those "if you don't vote, we'll know" ads i saw pre-election. That's creepy.
But i'll say this: if you are a conservative who didn't vote in the midterm, please know that i don't want to hear ONE SINGLE FREAKING WORD from you about what comes next.
Texas friends, you still have two hours. If you are on the fence, I would encourage you to vote. Even if you're not excited about the personal behavior of your party's candidate, remember that we and our kids are impacted by a candidate's policy, not their personality.
Daughter 1: “Dad! Don’t forget, we’re supposed to give out the books about God with the candy!”
Daughter 2: “Yeah, so they can be believers!”
So the kids on our block got candy, and their parents got the Gospel…and candy.
Dave Mitchell, Stochastic Humorist retweeted
The most explicit Christian statement from the White House in American history:
"This Reformation Day, I send my best wishes to the countless Christians across our country commemorating the Protestant Reformation and its enduring message of salvation by God’s grace through faith in Jesus Christ."
This is not what I voted for purely due to a failure of my imagination.
whitehouse.gov/briefings-sta…
Dave Mitchell, Stochastic Humorist retweeted
A statement from the White House on Reformation Day. As a Christian and an American, I am thankful for this. I could qualify it with criticisms of the current administration (which I do have), but I will not. This acknowledgement is a good thing, whatever the motivation.
whitehouse.gov/briefings-sta…
Dave Mitchell, Stochastic Humorist retweeted
Too many of my peers bitter about their evangelical upbringing and focused on raising their kids as a pendulum swing reaction to how their parents did things.
Meanwhile I’m over here evangelical childhood-maxxing, raising my kids on John MacArthur sermons, Elisabeth Elliot books, the Christian school curriculum of my youth, CCM of the 80s-90s, Psalty the Singing Songbook, Adventures in Odyssey, and Focus on the Family Clubhouse Magazine.
I for one am fully in favor of government agents intimidating non-citizens from voting in a national election.
Latino citizens of these United States, I hope you have a great Election Day and can vote with confidence, ID in hand, just like the rest of your fellow Americans.
Okay, I'm sick to death of the constant advertisements with subtly threatening statements about your family, friends, and neighbors knowing whether or not you voted. It's manipulative and annoying.
Dave Mitchell, Stochastic Humorist retweeted
Two copies of The Coming of Arthur by @malcolmguite to give away, out Nov 9 from Rabbit Room
To enter: like, repost, and comment.
Winners Nov 2. US only.
Two more for Substack subscribers. Or preorder, if you’d rather not risk it. Links below.
Good word.
Social media back-and-forths on Christian Nationalism-related matters suffer from a seemingly insurmountable problem: participants routinely conflate words and opinions with actions and violence. But instead of issuing trigger warnings and demanding safe spaces, we cry "slander!", issue a Ninth Commandment proclamation against our foes, and self-righteously demand that the rest of the Internet enforce our verdict.
It's a peculiar form of Christianized speech policing, where criticism, disagreement, rebuke, or even an uncharitable interpretation is elevated from something we dislike into a moral offense against God Himself. And once we've declared ourselves the victims of such an offense, we assume the authority to adjudicate the matter, pronounce judgment, and demand that everyone else recognize the guilt of the accused.
Of course, genuine slander exists. Bearing false witness is sinful, and Christians are obligated to speak truthfully about their neighbors (Exodus 20:16; Ephesians 4:25). But criticism is not inherently slander, disagreement is not violence, and even poorly formed, unfair, or materially false speech is not automatically evidence of malicious intent. The moral evaluation of someone's words requires considerably more care than simply announcing that we have been wronged.
The tell is when public Christian figures begin treating criticism of themselves as actual material harm—a kind of violence or violation of their rights—rather than speech to be answered, corrected, or, when appropriate, rebuked. This pious pre-adjudication does something rather convenient: it rhetorically transforms an opponent from someone who might be mistaken, unfair, or even genuinely sinful into a morally disqualified enemy.
And once someone has been placed into that category, apparently all bets are off.
The critic is no longer simply wrong. He's a liar, a slanderer, a wicked man, an enemy of righteousness. His arguments need not be represented accurately, his motives may be freely presumed, and his character can be reduced to whatever contemptuous category best serves the occasion. Caricature, ridicule, insinuation, and crass generalizations become permissible because, after all, look what kind of person we're dealing with!
The initial accusation of slander thus becomes the mechanism by which we grant ourselves permission to slander. The designation of an enemy becomes the mechanism by which we excuse treating him in ways Christ expressly forbids.
And this is where the whole exercise becomes especially absurd.
The Ninth Commandment does not cease to apply to us because we believe someone else has violated it. Scripture condemns not merely lying, but malicious speech, false accusations, and the misuse of the tongue (James 3:5–10; Colossians 3:8–9). We are forbidden to repay evil for evil (Romans 12:17), commanded to avoid reviling in return when reviled (1 Peter 3:9), and explicitly instructed by Christ to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us (Matthew 5:44).
Notice that none of these commands contains an exception for opponents who have actually wronged us.
Indeed, loving one's enemies would be a rather meaningless command if it applied only to people who had never treated us unjustly.
Even a genuinely slanderous opponent is not thereby rendered "fair game" for our own sinful behavior. We may correct him, rebuke him, expose his falsehoods, and demand accountability where appropriate. But we may not abandon truthfulness, fairness, or Christian charity in doing so. The fact that someone has sinned against us does not confer upon us the right to sin against him.
Ironically, the very people demanding painstakingly charitable interpretations of their own words will sometimes offer their opponents nothing of the sort. They insist upon precision when describing their own positions while indulging sweeping, dehumanizing categories when describing everyone else's. They demand that their motives be judged favorably while confidently assigning the worst possible motives to their critics.
It's a remarkable asymmetry, particularly among Christians who profess to believe that God's moral law is universal, objective, and binding upon everyone.
Somehow, we've convinced ourselves that thin skin is actually toughness, that indignation is discernment, and that responding to every criticism with the imprecatory finality of God Himself demonstrates spiritual courage. We condemn the therapeutic culture's obsession with emotional injury while adopting its central conceit: that being offended or wronged grants us special moral privileges in how we treat others.
But it doesn't.
The Christian response to injustice is not to manufacture a class of people toward whom justice is no longer required. Nor does Scripture permit us to replace Christ's command to love our neighbors with a friend/enemy distinction in which our friends receive every benefit of the doubt and our enemies receive none.
"Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good" (Romans 12:21).
That command is not suspended when the evil is directed at us.
Words are not violence simply because we'd like the emotional and rhetorical advantage of calling them that. Criticism is not slander merely because it stings. And even when genuine slander occurs, the person committing it does not forfeit his claim to truthful, just, and Christian treatment.
If our defense of the Ninth Commandment requires us to violate it, perhaps we weren't defending the commandment in the first place.
What the actual heck is this.
This right here is not acceptable.
I am down for encouraging people to vote. But the implied threat of being outed for not voting in an election is some prog-coded Commie-style horse crap.
Dave Mitchell, Stochastic Humorist retweeted
N.D. Wilson : Why I Write Scary Stories for Children from @TheAtlantic @ndwilsonmutters
Six years into my career as a children’s novelist, I was in need of a big story. My 100 Cupboards trilogy was off wandering the world in various translations, and I was hoping to wrap up The Ashtown Burials series the following year. And then what? Nothing. The calendar was empty. The future was blank. A new and strange uncertainty hung over my notebooks and bulletin boards.
I caught a nasty virus and went down hard, sweating and helpless with fever. The experience was as miserable as such sicknesses tend to be, right up until the increased brain heat brought me the strangest dream. By the time the fever broke and I was able to join my family at the dining room table, I had a new story ready to be pitched to my offspring.
Kids, meet Sam Miracle. He lives in a ranch outside of Tucson and he’s traumatically disabled, both mentally and physically. Sam struggles constantly with memory loss, he has daydreams of adventures in which he always dies, and his arms are so badly damaged that his elbows won’t bend.
My horrified children stopped eating and began straightening their arms in curious sympathy. So far, so good. They were gripped, breathing the heat of the desert while Sam was hunted by a San Francisco banker turned time-hopping arch-outlaw. They felt Sam’s extreme pain when his rigid arms were brutally shattered and he wavered on the edge of death. And then, when I told them how his arms were not only saved, but became faster than any arms had ever been before, they were so rapt they were barely breathing.
Two live rattlesnakes were grafted into Sam’s arms—one nice, one mean. He rattles whenever he’s surprised or scared, and his hands now have minds of their own. His right arm is out of control and perpetually distracted. His left arm wants to kill him and everything else it can reach.
Over dinner, spawned by a fever dream, Outlaws of Time was born. It’s a scary book, and the scariness is no accident. This story is a safe place that—at times—feels unsafe, a place where young readers can experience vicarious fear and practice vicarious courage, where they can watch new friends sacrifice and become heroes.
I write violent stories. I write dark stories. I write them for my own children, and I write them for yours. Every kid in every classroom, every kid in a bunk bed frantically reading by flashlight, every latchkey kid and every helicoptered kid, every single mortal child is growing into a life story in a world full of dangers and beauties. Every one will have struggles and ultimately, every one will face death and loss.
There is absolutely a time and a place for The Pokey Little Puppy and Barnyard Dance, just like there’s a time and a place for footie pajamas. But as children grow, fear and danger and terror grow with them, courtesy of the world in which we live and the very real existence of shadows. The stories on which their imaginations feed should empower a courage and bravery stronger than whatever they are facing.
With five children of my own (currently aged between 6 and 14), I live within a perfect focus group. Like many parents and teachers and librarians, I often look into a pair of eyes and hear the question, “What should I read next?” At any given moment, a dozen books are being consumed in our home: Anne of Green Gables, The Penderwicks, The Wingfeather Saga, and Amulet. Stories are being shared, told, and revisited all the time in our house, and when I venture out on tour or into schools, I meet thousands of kids who are off on the same fictional journeys as my own.
Overwhelmingly, in my own family and far beyond, the stories that land with the greatest impact are those where darkness, loss, and danger (emotional or physical) is a reality. But the goal isn’t to steer kids into stories of darkness and violence because those are the stories that grip readers. The goal is to put the darkness in its place.
When my eldest was first reading C.S. Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia on his own, he encountered an ink illustration of the White Witch’s evil band drawn by Pauline Baynes. Cue the nightmares. He couldn’t go on reading, and every time he slept, he saw those creatures coming to life and pursuing him.
In the wee hours of one nightmarish encounter, I realized that I had two choices. On the one hand, I could begin sheltering him from every single thing that his rich imagination might magnify and enliven into terror. This was my protective paternal impulse, but it seemed as impossible as it was short-sighted. I would be facilitating the preservation of his fearfulness.
My other course was to try and embolden his subconscious mind. I carried my son into my office and downloaded an old version of Quake—a first-person shooter video game with nasty, snarling aliens ten times worse than anything drawn by Pauline. We raced through the first level, blasting every monster and villain away. Then we high-fived, I pitched him a quick story about himself as a monster hunter, and then I prayed with him and tucked him back into bed.
I didn’t. The nightmare never shook him again.
Jump a few years and four more children. My youngest daughter was devouring all sorts of sweet little bookfs. At her insistence, I even wrote a pair of board books just for her (Hello Ninja and Blah Blah Black Sheep). Despite all that wholesomeness, she entered a very dark period during which she was inexplicably haunted by dragons.
“Well, there’s my nightmare,” she said.
Turning, I saw it—a wriggling, snarling, slavering dragon squaring off with a mascot knight on a high school pep banner.
My relief was instantaneous. That evening, I told her one of the scariest, funniest, most violent bedtime stories ever. I got the dragon description just right, and boy, did that serpent lose big. He died for good, right along with her nightmares.
I’m not interested in stories that sear terrifying images or monsters or villains into young minds—enough of those exist in the real world. I am interested in telling stories that help prepare living characters for tearing those monsters down.
I don’t write horror. But I do write stories about terrified sheltered kids and fatherless kids and kids with the ghosts of abuse in their pasts. Those kids encounter horrors—witches and swamp monsters, black magical doors and undying villains, mad scientists and giant cheese-loving snapping turtles. Those kids feel real pain, described in real ways. They feel real loss. They learn that the truest victory comes from standing in the right place and doing the right thing against all odds, even if doing the right thing means losing everything. Even if doing the right thing means death. My characters live in worlds that are fundamentally beautiful and magical, just like ours, in worlds that are broken and brutal, just like ours. And, when characters live courageously and sacrificially, good will ultimately triumph over evil.
I’m not trying to con kids into optimism or false confidence. I really believe this stuff. My view of violence and victory in children’s stories hinges entirely on my faith. Samson lost his eyes and died … but he has new eyes in the resurrection. Israel was enslaved in Egypt, but God sent a wizard far more powerful than Gandalf to save His people. Christ took the world’s darkness on his shoulders and died in agony. But then … Easter.
In the end, good wins. Always.
There’s a time for amusement, for laughter and farcical tales. There’s a time for escapism and comfort and wish fulfillment. There’s a time for sibling drama and humor and stories of shy heartbreak and school pressures. Intense and suspenseful pulse-pounding tales aren’t the one true diet for young readers. But I believe them to be healthy for growing imaginations, as essential as protein and calcium for young bones and muscles.
My children have only ever known me as a writer. When the older three still toddled, I was always plinking away on a keyboard in the corner of their playroom. By the time all five were fully aware, I was writing in an office at the end of a long attic with bunk beds tucked into dormers. Their night-light was the glow beneath my door, and when someone couldn’t sleep or a dream took a bad turn, I was the closest port in the storm.
In our house, when a day has brought struggle or pain or frustration, when we’ve stood at a deathbed or beside a new grave, we gather together, we sit down and listen. We assess characters and choices, villains and themes. We talk about darkness, we talk about light. We talk about loss and bittersweet victory. We talk about winter and spring resurrections.
And through all of this talking, my children have learned: the most important stories are the stories we live.
The rest are all food for the journey.
Introduce yourself by listing 10 bands you've seen live?
DC Talk
Switchfoot
Weird Al Yankovic
Ben Folds (Five)
The Avett Brothers
The Civil Wars
Paul McCartney
The OC Supertones
Counting Crows
U2
Tough to narrow down, so I tried to hit different eras of my musical taste.
I live in Texas and can confirm. We got one of these flyers sent to our house as well, addressed to "The Students of the Mitchell Household."
These people are PREDATORS.
A close friend in Texas just received this pamphlet in the mail addressed to HIS CHILDREN.
It targets kids who think they may be transgender and points them to resources on how to:
a) LEAVE THEIR PARENTS
b) How to travel OUT OF STATE for trans care
c) How be EMANCIPATED from their parents at 16
d) Education on hormones and SURGERY
...this was sent to HIS KIDS DIRECTLY





















