oc • cognitive engineer 🧩 • vertinski robotics 🤖 FTL

Joined May 2011
can you read this?
9
12
1
104
Xenon retweeted
変拍子
30
926
105
6,867
203,777
Xenon retweeted
Everyday is zero-day these days
2,398
2,241
460
26,969
2,052,760
Printed the first "Hello world" from my open-source firmware 😁😁 It's reversed (pun intended), but we are close!
F*** that printer. I'm RE its firmware now
31
29
11
978
24,136
would be really funny if the constants used in elliptic curves and sha256 directly translated to be the most optimal setups for sub-exponential calculation 👌😭
Replying to @AndrewCurran_
The Exponential Time Hypothesis is false.
1
4
132
that would also prove that US had high capability AI already in 1950s - which is actually possible
1
1
9
taking notes ….
26
This is actually somewhat scary Suppose we detect such neurons in serious, no-bullshit near-frontier models like 1017. Then a worm gets into neoclouds they're hosted at, and modifies the weights. Some people will notice instantly. But with full-access agentic coding at 1500 tps…
43
13
11
688
29,109
oh, nice! max coverage + impact 👌
Announcing 3 Critical vulns for hundreds of millions of IoT, Firewalls, OT, and Military devices including: Palo Alto Networks, Comcast, D-Link, HP, Canon, Honeywell, GE, Oracle, Siemens, Rockwell, Digi, Lockheed Martin, Boeing... The vulns are with GoAhead Web Server which is a backend library used by these devices. There's a patch available from GoAhead but that doesn't mean there's a patch available for the devices yet -- that's up to the manufacturer. - TLS traffic over DHE ciphers have a 1-byte secret, "04", meaning anyone can decrypt connections to these devices and steal login credentials and session tokens if the client negotiated with DHE ciphers like the latest TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256, which is extremely likely. - LibreSSL mTLS has been completely bypassed, meaning anyone can connect over mTLS. If you have one of these devices listening on the internet and are expecting mTLS to protect it from attackers, take it offline or patch asap. - OpenSSL Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) are not enforced, meaning if a user device is stolen or compromised, and you revoke that mTLS cert, nothing actually happens. There are a lot of other attacks this can be used for. These are critical because these types of devices run our world. Water systems, electricity, military, firewalls, critical infrastructure. foxio.io/blog/choose-your-ba…
2
89
Feynman Path Integral At a beer party at the Nassau Tavern in Princeton, a young Richard Feynman asked Herbert Jehle whether anyone had built Quantum Mechanics out of the action. The next day Jehle showed him a paper by Dirac in the library. That led to Feynman's idea that a particle takes every possible path at once, and each path adds a little spinning arrow. As more paths through these slits get added here, their arrows add up into the real interference pattern.
8
24
2
290
9,319
AI gets human psychosis for a change
New blog post: We let Qwen3.5-2B pick its own reward in RL. This ends up eliciting very diverse model personas, ranging from humany-talk 🧍, bliss ✨, universe lover 🪐, to the Guardian Angel of China 🛡️.
4
183
es pamazām būvēju wifi bāzētu mesh tīklu pilnīgi nekādu legālu ierobežojumu jo tas ir standarta rūteris max upside - pilsētas līmeņa pārklājums ar lokālu internetu dm
3
67
A developer left a standard Bluetooth Low Energy tracker sitting on a wooden post. It was running on a coin cell, broadcasting a tiny 6-milliwatt pulse (+8 dBm) through a cheap copper PCB trace. Then they drove 13 kilometers (8 miles) down the road. You would assume Bluetooth has a ten-meter leash. I mean we build smart locks, car digital keys, and proximity badges around the quiet belief that Bluetooth dies at the front door. But radio waves do not understand room boundaries. They leave an antenna and expand across the horizon according to the inverse-square law, diluting into space. Follow that packet across the countryside. Leaving the tag at 2.44 GHz, the signal loses 122.5 decibels of power by the time it travels 13 kilometers through open air. It arrives on a distant hillside as a microscopic whisper at roughly -115 dBm, buried deep under the thermal hiss of background atmospheric noise. A standard smartphone sitting on that hill is completely deaf to it. The builder did not touch the transmitter. They left it completely stock and FCC-compliant. Instead, they solved the math on the receiving end. They hauled a 24 dBi parabolic grid antenna onto a mast and aimed its narrow eight-degree beam directly back at the distant tag. That dish acts like a massive radio funnel, capturing faint wavefronts across its metallic grid and concentrating them into a 24-decibel passive boost. Then they triggered Bluetooth 5 Coded PHY. Standard Bluetooth blasts bits at 1 megabit per second, which requires a strong signal to decode before errors corrupt the frame. Coded PHY sacrifices speed for range. It slows throughput down to 125 kilobits per second, using forward error correction to encode every single bit of data across eight separate symbols. That mathematical trade lowers the receiver sensitivity floor down to -104 dBm. On paper, the link budget gave a comfortable 13-decibel safety margin. Out in the field, the terrain fought back. Radio energy does not travel in an infinitely thin laser line. Over 13 kilometers, the wave expands into an elliptical cylinder known as the first Fresnel zone, swelling to 20 meters (65 feet) wide at the midpoint. Every hilltop, tree canopy, and barn roof entering that 20-meter zone scattered the wave. Signals reflecting off the dirt arrived slightly out of phase with the direct beam, carving deep cancellation nulls. Over a thirteen-minute listening window, the receiver caught exactly three intact packets. Three packets every few minutes is useless for streaming audio or loading a webpage. But for physical surveillance, three packets is total visibility. Apple Find My, Google Find My Device, Tile trackers, continuous glucose monitors, and car digital key fobs broadcast unsolicited advertisement beacons every second. An attacker sitting on a high-rise balcony or flying a drone with a directional grid antenna does not need to connect to your phone or crack an encryption handshake. They only need to listen. Bluetooth is thirty-year-old technology, yet modern operating systems still treat its signal as proof of physical proximity. An antenna with passive gain proves that proximity was an illusion all along.
9
People seem to forget how unprecedented this is
Anthropic has filed an S-1 registration statement with the SEC related to its proposed IPO. Read more: anthropic.com/news/s1-sec Legal disclaimer: A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
71
137
29
3,219
260,874
stop the PERL clutching
1
1
3
130
yo @certlv kad jūs informēsiet cilvēkus par šo ievainojamību? 👀
kāpēc @certlv neko neraksta par emudhra CA sertifikātu katastrofu? tas ir svarīgi un aktuāli jau vairākas dienas kopš publiskā paziņojuma (bet īstenībā caurums ir jau pusotru gadu)
2
1
4
525
bled @certlv jūs kko darīsiet vai nē šis jau izskatās pēc nolaidības 👀 vai arī jūs esat tik retarded ka nesaprotat kas notiek ….
‼️ Cisco says its IOS XR routers and Meraki cameras trust eight eMudhra certificate authorities whose private keys were numbers below 256. Anyone can recover those keys in seconds and forge HTTPS certificates for any website. Cisco is still investigating its ASA firewalls.
1
15
mitm uzbrukumam pakļautās CISCO tehnoloģijas (ieskaitot korporatīvo komunikāciju):
10
Xenon retweeted
I made an inverse design with BeamZ to solve MNIST.
23
38
5
605
22,375
Xenon retweeted
I'm not talking about AI here. I'm talking about quantum computers. Chemistry is computable in polynomial-time with bounded entanglement.[1] I'm not saying literally this exact paper is the algorithm you would use, but it is suggestive of the broader principle. So when I say, "I think the quantum state space is compressible by AI", I'm thinking "wet biological systems are so noisy that I expect them to decohere very quickly almost everywhere, and so there will probably be a polynomial-time algorithm that runs much faster than naive Schrodinger's, except there might be small-scale features like chemical reactions, maybe those mysterious 'vaults', edges of neurons, etc. that do rely on local entanglement". And I expect looped AI models to find an algorithm that approximates it well if it can be done at all. There's also a new paper that more direct on the "noisy implies efficiently simulatable" thesis[2], although I was only aware of the earlier one when I thought it. I think it'll take 10 years for IBM to release quantum computers usable to start getting good data to do this; and another 10 years for people to figure out novel quantum algorithms once they can experiment. And since the genetic code is known and the rough distributions of gases and chemicals is known and these systems must be error-corrective to function robustly, following the attractor points with a seeded initial state will let you simulate the insides of cells. That doesn't mean you put all 10^27 atoms in a person times 10^15 femtoseconds to simulate a person exactly for a second. But you could build up a model of organelles, then cells, then organs. And eventually you could even prove it has bounded error compared to naive exponential algorithm that does solve it exactly. So: With exponential compute, chemistry and therefore biology are solvable exactly. And it looks like you don't even need exponential compute. And if you do, we have quantum computers coming in 10 years. [1] arxiv.org/abs/1307.5143v1 [2] arxiv.org/abs/2610.06769
If you had an exponential amount of compute you could solve simulate biology exactly and wouldn't need to run any experiments. Some of you will think "of course, but that's an unrealistic assumption" and others will think "no, you need experiments even with that much compute. That's just How It's Done". You would of course need evaluations once you have a solution, but you don't in principle need experiments to find it: Experiments are a way to save compute, dating from a time when it was much more expensive. And I think the presentation is exponential but real systems aren't irreducibly exponential. AlphaFold worked, after all.
5
5
71
2,482
you can’t imagine the amount of hardware larp on ig 😅
27
when feasible my startup will produce O/OFF furniture what is ON/OFF furniture you may ask that means you subscribe to the freshest lounge recliner 9000 and flip the switch - voila! it appears in your living room AND you can sit on it 👌 quantum phys allows this 📠
can't wait for matter replicators so when I buy something online it gets emailed to my house
1
82