Pardon me. "Breaking" not "braking"
As the X series "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand" clearly establishes, you cannot take MP's or judges to court, regardless of their crimes. They use the Ministry of Justice to prevent you filing, submitting evidence, braking the law in doing so. No consequences.
4
268
If you begin to ruffle feathers with irrefutable evidence, even DOH's own publications and correspondence, the judge will deem you unfit to testify. This is where your lawyer needs to be familiar with judges propensity for declaring evidence inadmissible in New Zealand
I hear what you are saying @TWikiriwhi . But, @mensallobos is right. There is no legal recourse, no way within the system to effect the changes you rightly ask for. A change of government is just that, it won't change their WEF Agenda goals. Non party, merit only based elections.
Absolutely. Most of the list were in the 120 MP's that voted for murder by mandate. Exempting themselves, knowing the jab was experimental, guaranteeing the commercial profitability of Pfizer's product. Subject to change without notice. It is actually treason.
why would you bother tagging these people they dont care or worse supported the jab and passes
@nzlabour
@chrishipkins
@shananhalbert
@NZNationalParty
@chrisluxonmp
@ChrisPenknz
@actparty
@dbseymour
@BrookevanVelden
@nzfirst
@winstonpeters
@TanyaUnkovichMP
@JudithCollinsMP
1
7
69
CDC WHO now have over 400 conditions that existed before COVID that have now been reassigned and relabelled as COVID. Of course, they cannot justify COVID "vaccinations" without COVID, they are desperate to keep the farce alive.
2
10
50
Difficult to stomach I know. Keep in mind she surrounds herself with paid sycophants, hence Oprah. Her conscience won't allow her to live in the real world. As others have suggested, she would make an ideal Psychology study subject. And yes, she is the stuff of nightmares.
1
13
102
Declaring a litigant "incapacitated" because he asks you to follow the law is a cowardly and criminal act by Montague, Robinson, and La Hood. Especially as he had represented himself in the earlier hearings and was confirmed capable of representing himself by their own inquires.
@PlatonianFire 's subject, the appellant certainly has the entire New Zealand justice system, courts included, against him. His crime? If you read the X Articles, he asked the judges to follow and adhere to the law. That is all. The judges and courts refused to.
4
11
172
Hipkins delusion aside, there are so many voters that will have forgotten murder by mandate, their human rights being violated, family and personal losses, Labour ignoring the sick and elderly. There is too much low hanging fruit in New Zealand for Labour to take advantage of.
"Whether you’re Māori, Pākehā, Pasifika, Asian or a new Kiwi, whether you’re young or old, gay, straight, transgender, wealthy or struggling, Labour sees you. Labour hears you. Labour is fighting for you" Hipkins said. chrislynchmedia.com/news-ite…
2
10
81
This is an admission that Gates has control of the US food chain in terms of procurement, supply, and implementation. @SecKennedy how can the US Government be that impotent and criminal?
This quoted post is unavailable.
2
10
87
Luxon is aspiring to lift New Zealand to the dizzy heights of Fiji.
This quoted post is unavailable.
10
54
Why doesn't that surprise me. How many New Zealanders know that. Judges can ignore expert medical opinion, that the judge has asked for and the NZ taxpayer has funded, official reports from IRD, MSD, testimony from peer judges and be considered a rational being.
To be fair, Perigo likely isn't aware the computer simulations in GenBank and GISAID aren't real world. The pushers of COVID never mention the lab cultures of diseased green monkey vero cells with added toxins are called COVID.
Exactly. If Lindsay Perigo believes in the Wuhan lab leak distraction from the US DoD funded vaccine manufacture, he can put his name forward to receive the $1M for a SARS-CoV-2 isolate that has been on offer for over 4 years.
9
53
All of those responsible, and there is a lot of them, will plead "plausible deniability" a.k.a "I was too stupid to know that I was stupid." There will be no consequences. In fact, they will be promoted. It is New Zealand after all.
If only. Klaus' book details the process of temporarily ameliorating public anger. To give the public a sense they are being listened to, hence the inquiry. Let's put it this way: Besides a slap on the wrist with a wet bus ticket, what outcome do you expect?
1
10
46
As posts have suggested, if many of their members administered the vaccine (and I hesitate to use that word) it would leave @nzdsos out in the cold, and culpable, if their audience knew that COVID does not exist.
Do you think that is why @nzdsos resurrected their belief in SARS-CoV-2 after it being proven not to exist? Was it purely in the interests of survival?
9
57
Court of Appeal, High Court, District Court and Judiciary are asserting their confessed crimes (in their decision documents) are not subject to any laws, not just the Crimes Act 1961, so yes, the legislation needs to be amended to make that clear.
No, not in the remotest. The offending judges know this. Hence refusing the appellant his right to a defence by ordering the court not to accept his filings. Corruption beyond the pale
9
47
As @mensallobos has stated, clearly the judiciary have abused their positions of power as they have clearly acted illegally in all 9 cases detailed. Violating 7 statutes in the process. Avoiding accountability by Illegally preventing the appellant from filing. Justice? No.
We need to recognise that judiciary are, as they have done, going to do everything in their power regardless of illegality, to prevent Justice Montague and Justice La Hood's complicit crimes be aired let alone answered for.
10
39