DeusInresit (@deusintersit) profile picture

Troubleshooter, agent for change. Back from Central Africa until needed again.

Joined February 2025
Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)Photo by DeusInresit (@deusintersit)
The commissions witness testimony destroyed any hope the government had of reestablishing credibility. The Inquiry witness belligerence, dissonance, and ignorance confirmed their profiteering. They couldn't help but reveal their guilt.
It is good work from @c_plushie. The desperation of the New Zealand government trying to avoid recognising vaccine damage demonstrates their WEF capture.
7
382
I agree with most in that the Inquiry is all theatre. They will not ask questions that establish Adern's guilt or profiteering.
Replying to @BarryYoungNZ
Ms Adern: Did you sign a contract that said "Pfizer reserves the right to add, modify, substitute product contents without notice in order to preserve its commercial viability." That is treason, reckless negligence, and profiteering. What we all look for in a Prime Minister [sic]
6
143
It is because @BarryYoungNZ did the right thing that he is in court. I have no doubt the crown will further embarrass themselves.
I recognise that truth telling is a punishable offence. Notwithstanding, from following the case closely, @BarryYoungNZ did more than make an effort to notify the respective parties of the causal link between vaccines and deaths. Morally and ethically, he did the right thing.
9
96
I have no doubt it is a WEF directive. The Bill will pass as sure as New Zealand is a WEF owned parliament. There is no opposition just WEF compliance. Filibuster and braggadocio sure, but as always, WEF compliance.
Replying to @ivydonna_
As you well know @nzdsos it a WEF directive. Lets put it this way, has a New Zealand's WEF government ever not done exactly what the WEF have ordered? Sack 123MP's and appoint a WEF Commissioner. Save $Billions with the same net result.
11
80
Replying to @JanciToxDoc
@JanciToxDoc You were exposed for being wrong and your emotions took over. Blocking replies is hardly the work of an honest Doctor.
9
Agree. The New Zealand public wouldn't bother with the courts, judges, lawyers, registrars and various other syphons. They would resort to natural law.
That is a very good point and the primary reason they do not tell the New Zealand public the truth. With no consequences for not following the law themselves, people would exact justice the natural way, quite rightly I might add, in the full knowledge the justice system is merely theatre.
6
67
New Zealand's WEF government has complied with every WEF directive. Parliament, petitions, inquiries, commissions are all theatre.
Replying to @LizGunnNZ
Gross overreach. There is no morally acceptable reason for CBDC. It is about control. And yes Liz, you are correct, there is no going back once implemented. New Zealand, being a WEF flagship nation, will be one of the first to adopt CBDC.
11
52
"It is written...." it is inevitable that something will happen to one or some of these belligerent despot judges. And yes, the media will be awash with excuses, crocodile tears. You know the drama.
I detect a false sense of security from New Zealands judiciary. When the inevitable happens, which it will, plausible deniability will be to the fore "we didn't know it was unacceptable to break the law...we were doing our best."
1
7
93
That this has only just become visible on X is testimony to the corruption being supported by New Zealand X censors Christchurch Call. The X Articles " The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand" are examples of licensed crime.
From what I've read, and thank you, your evidence of corruption is overwhelming, and they cannot deny it as most is in their own hand. The only recourse your Government has is to suppress it and/or prevent you from presenting it.
5
66
It has to be said your Judicial Conduct Commissioner is clearly a coward. Anybody, not just a judicial conduct commissioner, that refuses the judges confessions to their crimes, in the offending judges own hand, is clearly compromised and not fit to be commissioner.
5
34
That is the most conclusive and extensive list of evidence I have ever seen. The Judges and the Courts have clearly committed several crimes in preventing justice. They must be held accountable for their crimes. You have the evidence in their own statements and hearing recordings
8
38
Yes. We need to move away from "it is assumed that...""...new research suggests..." as they are almost always financially and politically motivated as @PlatonianFire has already pointed out. There is a reason Randomised Control Tests are not being conducted on shedding.
Replying to @MurfittTauranga
Wouldn't the whole issue (no pun intended) of shedding be resolved if and RCT was conducted to establish shedding? No volunteers from CDC, 194 WHO member nations, UNC Chapel Hill, EcoHealth Alliance, NIH, NIAID, NIS, NHS. A scientifically verifiable test.
10
43
Which compounds the issue for somebody trying to get justice. Complaining about registrars illegal actions will net the same result as a judge caught manufacturing evidence, admitting false testimony, and committing perjury. Nothing, zilch, crickets.
Replying to @8of9J
I have no doubt the registrars are breaking the law and their rules of conduct because they have been threatened by the offending judges. That does not however, justify their complicity.
8
41
It gets worse. Have you seen the latest X Article from @PlatonianFire "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand: Court of Appeal. Abdication of duty of office." Mind boggling, an abuse of power, and as the article establishes, refusing to follow several laws and the legislation.
Replying to @kaiviti_cam
Further enhancing the veracity of @PlatonianFire 's X Articles "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand." Is anybody really surprised at judicial recidivism?
7
43
Pharma has planned well in advance for post vaccine harm consequences. You need only look into the contracts governments signed that protect pharma income, reputation, market, and futures in respective countries.
Replying to @ivydonna_
Look into the structure and ownsership of modeRNA. Suspension won't hurt them. They, as were BioNTech, expecting more of a backlash post vaccine injury.
9
30
The first thing Wellington needs to do is make sure Andrew Little does not become mayor. The media frenzy to paint him as the only candidate is a sure enough sign it will be the end of Wellington. Wellington cannot sustain another Adernite. The debt position is unsustainable now.
Replying to @SimonRAnderson
Wellington has been tortured enough. Don't make the rest of New Zealand accountable.
1
10
66
Replying to @DrSuzanneH7
Replying to @DrSuzanneH7
Why did you block the thread from @tuffnstuff13031 it is a genuine question that deserves an answer.
9
If it is an inquiry, the context, duration, and outcome have already been decided. It is WEF policy to encourage petitions, commissions, inquiries, and investigations. It ameliorates public anger temporarily.
Pressure is building and building. And we’re only just getting started - our inquiry will keep this scandal in the public eye for weeks and weeks and weeks to come. I assure you - it won’t fade away this time.
10
64
Aren't the New Zealand government a despicable undesirable bunch of WEF sycophants. Dirty deeds done dirt cheap. Instead of preventing the corruption, their first though is to cover it up.
There is synergy between Goldsmith's reappointments to all positions in the CCRC and Judith Collins being Attorney General and Public Service Minister. They can and will prevent all judicial crimes (224) coming to light and those of government officials.
9
76
From "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand" X Article series. None of court registrars, case managers, the 3 conspiring judges and their appointed legal teams, or the Judicial Conduct Commissioner, have been able to answer for their corruption. Systemic corruption.
How can the Judge who has committed the crimes be the judge deciding if an appeal, on the basis of his crimes, be allowed? How can the Litigation Assistant who has committed the crimes represent the person he committed those crimes against?
3
1
9
108