ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
5 years from now kids won't believe games used to be made by hand 😭
Excited to share Genie 4 today our most realistic and interactive world model:
- steer dynamic environments in real time, shaping events, camera angles, and actions
- generate native audio matched to the world, from realistic background sounds to characters who can converse in real time!
- simulate photorealistic scenes and real-world physics
- create more coherent multi-step events through reasoning from Gemini
We've started to roll out as a research preview to trusted testers. Coming soon to Google AI Ultra subscribers in Project Genie and early access partners via the Gemini API and AI Studio.
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
Replying to @EMostaque @OpenAI
Onwards to high FPS video, then make it in high resolution VR.
Blackwell -> Rubin -> Feynman 💎
Still people thinking we’re not living in a simulation?
Add another narrative / storytelling AI to orchestrate it all and we’re almost there …
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
Tesla just registered another 81 Cybercabs for its Robotaxi fleet, bringing the total number of Cybercabs registered to date to 546, according to the Texas DMV.
This means Tesla has now added nearly 200 Cybercabs to its robotaxi in just the last week alone.
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
The Cybercab has officially surpassed the Model Y in total robotaxi registrations in Texas.
Vehicles registered for Tesla’s Robotaxi fleet in Texas:
• Cybercab: 544
• Model Y: 507
Total: 1,051
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
breaking!!! we just cracked 1k
1051 robotaxis registered in tx
544 cybercabs
507 model y
$TSLA texasavtracker.com/tesla
970 robotaxis registered in tx
463 cybercabs
507 model y
$TSLA texasavtracker.com/tesla
Reference skepticism
Replying to @Y_Jehoash
Still torn about Video Gen, with framerate high enough you have infinite detail and perfect realism, you can’t get that with the way Claude produces these with code
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
💯 this $TSLA fam.
Pushing a “merge already” letter with no exchange ratio floor, not even 50/50 ownership of the combined company, isn’t bullish. The absence of that floor throws leverage out the window. It hypes retail and softens what ratio $SPCX thinks they can float.
You don’t have to follow the herd. Change your perspective instead of blindly signing a letter.
It’s ok to think for yourself.
ARK’s Brett Winton on the podcast
1. Over the weekend, SpaceX executives followed Tesla’s X account. That looks like a sign that something is happening internally.
2. SpaceX is cash-flow constrained. It could raise more money in the stock market, but the investment opportunities in front of SpaceX offer some of the highest expected returns on invested capital(ROIC) of any company I’ve ever looked at.
3. Tesla, on the other hand, is about to enter the phase where its robotaxi network starts generating huge amounts of cash. And I don’t think Optimus is cash-constrained. The issue is execution. There are still challenges to solve on both the mechanical and software sides.
4. So if SpaceX could use Tesla’s free cash flow to launch AI satellites, the results could be enormous. Every business of a future-oriented company would come together under one roof: SpaceX, superintelligence, and Tesla.
In short, SpaceX has huge long-term opportunities, but it needs Tesla’s cash flow to get there.
The ones who really need this merger right now aren’t Tesla. They’re SpaceX and Elon.
If they really want to do it, they need to bring an exchange ratio generous enough to pass the shareholder vote on the first try.
Some influencers keep pushing the merger as if it’s the only option, without even mentioning a premium.
All that does is hype up retail investors and weaken Tesla shareholders’ negotiating leverage. That’s irresponsible, and it deserves to be called out.
ARK’s Brett Winton on the podcast
1. Over the weekend, SpaceX executives followed Tesla’s X account. That looks like a sign that something is happening internally.
2. SpaceX is cash-flow constrained. It could raise more money in the stock market, but the investment opportunities in front of SpaceX offer some of the highest expected returns on invested capital(ROIC) of any company I’ve ever looked at.
3. Tesla, on the other hand, is about to enter the phase where its robotaxi network starts generating huge amounts of cash. And I don’t think Optimus is cash-constrained. The issue is execution. There are still challenges to solve on both the mechanical and software sides.
4. So if SpaceX could use Tesla’s free cash flow to launch AI satellites, the results could be enormous. Every business of a future-oriented company would come together under one roof: SpaceX, superintelligence, and Tesla.
In short, SpaceX has huge long-term opportunities, but it needs Tesla’s cash flow to get there.
The ones who really need this merger right now aren’t Tesla. They’re SpaceX and Elon.
If they really want to do it, they need to bring an exchange ratio generous enough to pass the shareholder vote on the first try.
Some influencers keep pushing the merger as if it’s the only option, without even mentioning a premium.
All that does is hype up retail investors and weaken Tesla shareholders’ negotiating leverage. That’s irresponsible, and it deserves to be called out.
Replying to @Jason_A_Scharf @RtaxiTracker
It was never a real contest
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
The only path forward is full stack engineering.
You will become a aerospace mechanical chemical design engineer and you will like it.
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
Announcing three major scientific discoveries, one each in mathematics (harmonic analysis), computer science (complexity theory), and physics (quantum field theory).
AI starting to help us improve our understanding of the universe! openai.com/index/building-sc…
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
Tesla has released new FSD (Supervised) safety data.
Miles per major collision:
• Teslas Driven With FSD (Supervised): 6,006,200
• Teslas Driven Manually (Active Safety Features): 2,031,221
• Teslas Driven Manually (No Active Safety Features): 845,915
• U.S. Average: 660,164
Total major collisions:
• Teslas with FSD (Supervised): 1,579
• Teslas driven manually with Active Safety: 17,775
• Teslas driven manually without Active Safety: 239
• U.S. average: 4,989,713
Total miles logged:
• Teslas with FSD (Supervised): 9,483,790,215
• Teslas driven manually with Active Safety: 36,104,958,020
• Teslas driven manually without Active Safety: 202,173,600
• U.S. drivers overall: 3,294,031,000,000
Tesla vehicles with FSD (Supervised) engaged experienced ~9x fewer major collisions than those driving without it on.
This is North America data across all road classes (highway and non-highway). The data reflects a rolling twelve-month aggregation of miles and collisions.
The answer is clear.
1. From Elon’s point of view, of course he wants this merger. It would give him far more voting control over Tesla.
2. From SpaceX’s side, it makes sense too. SpaceX needs a cash cow to fund its massive space investments. Its data center rental business runs on spot pricing, so its profits are volatile and low quality. Tesla’s upcoming robotaxi cash flow is exactly the stable income SpaceX lacks.
3. But for Tesla shareholders other than Elon, why merge now, at today’s valuations? Maybe later, but not now. Tesla has $45B in cash and is just about to start making real money from robotaxis.
That’s exactly why the deal has to come with a premium Tesla shareholders can’t refuse.
ASI - Tech Gone Wild 🤖❤️🔥☠️ retweeted
Great question. To which no Musk fanatic will answer.
Hey @elonmusk can Tesla get some Nvidia chips that were ordered by SpaceX?
Fair is fair, right?
Compute is really valuable and could help Tesla right?





























