DronasArk retweeted
The majority of Indians in France come from its overseas territories.
France holds the Indian island of Réunion with 300,000 Indians, Guadeloupe with 60,000 Indians and French Guiana with 13,000 Indians.
It can give it up these territories to the Republic of India and end up with less than 400,000 Indian origin people any day and begin it's journey to become a White ethnostate.
Quick, what city are you looking at here?
Everyone immediately understands it's somewhere in India. There are Indians doing Indian things
Except this is actually Paris, France
Indians do not assimilate, do not respect other cultures, do not have any understanding of social rules
They must be banned from every Western nation or this is the inevitable result
DronasArk retweeted
I don’t mean to sound like Draco Malfoy, but I am pure-blooded Dehati.
My mother gave birth to me in a dark kaccha village hut on the banks of the Banas River. Dehat is the blood of her labour, soaking into that lipai floor.
That year, ecofeminists like Arundhati Roy were protesting against the construction of dams on rivers. Dams that would provide electricity to villages like mine.
My parents and I have worked very hard to get out of Dehat, and I feel so much joy when I see leftists, corrupt bureaucrats, and dynastic politicians throw tantrums when we don’t vote for them.
I am not going to romanticise the poverty my parents came from, or the spiritual environmentalism that leftists promote to keep women like my mother backward.
I will remain unapologetically anti-Dehat.
DronasArk retweeted
“Comrade, if you had five houses, would you give four to the Party?"
Of course Comrade, for the sake of the revolution!"
“And if you had five luxury cars l, would you give four to the state?"
“Without hesitation Comrade! The working class comes first."
“And if you had five iPhone 18 Pros, would you give four to your neighbors?"
“Why not! The proletariat must share in technology!"
“And if you had five chickens would you give four to your commune?”
“No way! Absolutely not!"
“But why? You are willing to give up houses, cars, and iPhones but you won't part with a few chickens? Why?”
“Because I actually have five chickens!"
Being born into affluence, possessing a luxury automobile, or belonging to a political dynasty does not inherently invalidate one’s commitment to communism. #Communism is an ideological conviction, not a certificate of poverty.
I often tell my students that, philosophically speaking, a baby’s first cry may be interpreted as the most rudimentary assertion of a fundamental right, the instinctive demand for nourishment, care, and survival. Although an infant is incapable of comprehending political ideology, that primordial cry symbolises an innate human need and the instinct to secure what is essential for existence.
Therefore, before branding @neha_aisa Neha Bora a fraud merely because she or her family may possess an expensive car, we must learn to distinguish ideological commitment from personal affluence. Scrutinise her arguments, interrogate her actions, and expose any demonstrable contradictions in her principles. But condemning someone’s political convictions solely on the basis of their family’s wealth is intellectual superficiality, not a substantive critique of ideology.
DronasArk retweeted
India didn't send combat troops to Korea. It sent something else: an airborne medical unit.
The 60th Parachute Field Ambulance arrived in late 1950 and served for more than three years. Doctors, surgeons, nurses' aides, and medics, all trained paratroopers.
They lived right alongside the frontline troops, including British and Commonwealth units, and treated anyone who came to them. Soldiers, civilians, refugees, even enemy prisoners.
When the UN retreated from North Korea in the brutal winter of 1950, the Indians stayed with the rearguard, treating wounded under fire.
In March 1951, they did something no medical unit had done in the war. They jumped out of airplanes with the US 187th Airborne at Munsan-ni and set up a field hospital in enemy territory to treat the paratroopers as they fought.
Over the course of the war, the unit is credited with treating more than 200,000 cases and performing thousands of surgeries, often in tents or ruined buildings.
Their commander, Lt. Col. A.G. Rangaraj, received India's second-highest wartime gallantry award.
After the armistice, India played another huge role: an Indian general led the neutral commission that oversaw tens of thousands of prisoners who refused to go home.
India never fired a shot at the enemy in Korea. But it saved an enormous number of lives.
DronasArk retweeted
Here's the harsh truth:
Once you make a new country on the basis of religion, it is only natural that the remainder wishes to move past that identity or to relegate it to the personal/private. Where the community may want to introspect is why is it that not a single Muslim emerged who could cast aside the identity by speaking in terms of the generality of politics and welfare. Not one who could present a larger economic vision. Even today, the best Muslims leaders are stuck speaking from the point of a single identity. Let's be clear that the Indian constitution, like many modern constitutions, protect minority (in fact, all) religious rights to the extent of their practice. They do not confer separate constitutional enclave status on that basis. So perhaps the question is about the identity being the sole basis of understanding society, the constitution and indeed the world.
DronasArk retweeted
Et tu, Bibi? I knew that you wouldn’t be able to restrain yourself. Good that you brought into open your “secular” thoughts and “patriotic” sentiments.
In your fanatic rage, you have likened me to Ujjwal Nikam, and Sharjeel Imam to Ajmal Kasab. You drew this parallel, not I—your inner thoughts and your moral compass, not mine. You seem to imply that Kasab was innocent, and the State framed him. Bravo, Bibi, bravo. By the way, then, the State was run by those whose dethronement has left you inconsolable.
Like many others of your ilk, you are also drawing into discussion an unrelated individual. I hope that he sues you for malicious and insidious doxing.
Look, an interview was published. It was hailed by the likes of you as a document—a veritable manifesto—of liberation of Muslims from the slavery of Hindus. It lambasted the liberal class (aren’t you one of them?) for being no different from the Hindu right wing. It called the Constitution (the book that the likes of you have lately become fond of waving) a fascist document, and condemned Nehru for myth making about India’s nationhood. Sharjeel had earlier called Gandhi the greatest fascist of the 20th century.
Being a liberal, you should have been up in arms against the contents of this interview. The whole liberal establishment should have been on its feet. But, no. Pin drop silence. Omertà. A hush-hush celebration of what he said.
(Since you wish him to be enlarged on bail early, do you think that The Quint did the right thing by publishing such a contentious piece, and that Sharjeel Imam acted in his own best interest by giving this interview?)
You expected that interview to go unchallenged. Your grouse against me is for calling out the liberal-Islamist alliance for its telling silence. I had to do what the leading lights of liberals should have done. I argued for the Constitution, for Gandhi and Nehru, and for liberalism and secularism. If you actually believed in these ideals shouldn’t you be thankful to me?
By the way, what’s your complaint against me besides my pen-name? Being a liberal-secular person where and why do you disagree with my essay?
I know, you disagree with its very existence. But then, you shouldn’t you have voiced your opposition to the publication of the said “interview” itself? But you happily lapped it up. Come, say openly that you didn’t want a counter to that.
If not, could you please tell me what’s your precise criticism of my piece? Have I misquoted Sharjeel? Have I made a tendentious selection from his speeches and writings, and reproduced them out of context so that they convey meanings other than intended? Have I misinterpreted and misunderstood him?
Ghazala, I will wait for you to write a full scale critique of my piece. Rip me apart, if you have the intellectual wherewithal and moral clarity for that. If not, keep hiding behind my pseudonym.
DronasArk retweeted
Hindus must learn shamelessness. IM commentators freely attack the basic concept of one-person-one-vote, simply because they are outnumbered. Learn to pursue a naked hunger for power like that, without any apology, in fact while abusing even your mildest critics, all while loudly crying you’re the victim. It makes for a terrible society, but the alternative seems sharia.
DronasArk retweeted
An Indian eye-surgery book vanished from China. Korea kept part of it.
The operation was cataract couching: a needle goes in beside the white of the eye and pushes the clouded lens out of the way. The Sushruta Samhita describes the Indian procedure.
By the Tang dynasty it was in Chinese medicine, taught under the name of one book, the Longshu pusa yanlun, "Bodhisattva Nagarjuna's eye treatise".
In 752 Wang Tao's Waitai miyao already quotes an older Indian treatise on the eye.
Then the trail breaks. The original Longshu book was not handed down in China. A large part of it was copied into Korea's great medical compendium Uibang yuchwi, compiled under King Sejong in 1445.
It has 8 sections and 30 eye diseases. It names heat and wind as main causes. It says the cataract forms when poison and heat gather in the brain and the eye's "oil" runs down over the pupil.
And it gives the golden-needle method step by step, to be done only when the film has hardened "like white jade".
Korean scholars Kim and Kang call it a record of Indian medical ideas already lost in China.
An operation travelled from India to China. The Chinese copies of the book were lost. A Korean encyclopedia kept the text. 🙏🙏
Sources: Wang Tao, Waitai miyao (752); Yi fang lei ju vol. 64 (Joseon); Kim & Kang, Korean J. Med. Hist. 22(1), 2013; Deshpande, Bull. SOAS (1999)
Photo 1: Cataract couching in India (painting, undated). Wellcome Library, London, CC BY 4.0
Photo 2: Uibang yuchwi, volume 201 cover (Joseon, 1477 per Commons). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
DronasArk retweeted
We heard some of you were looking for Spies, Black Ties, & Mango Pies – well we found a copy in our library!
CIA's 1997 cookbook features recipes like "Hamburger Pie," "Party Potatoes," and "Fail-Safe Chocolate Chip Cookies" – just what we all need for the holiday weekend 🇺🇸
They are right. Indian Muslims grow up in a cosmopolitan and multicultural society. That makes them way cooler than people in Pakistan, where every sub-sect is fighting the other over their Muslimness and minorities are systematically wiped out.
If she IS Indian, she looks Indian. We know that’s what Indians look like, because she is Indian, and that’s what she looks like.
DronasArk retweeted
His parents named him Antariksh. In Sanskrit, it means space. He grew up, watched someone close to him spend six hours in a cancer ward connected to a drug drip, and spent the next phase of his life figuring out why that infusion could not be shorter. The answer was gravity. The answer to gravity was orbit.
Keytruda, one of the most powerful cancer immunotherapies in the world, takes five to six hours to enter the bloodstream because the drug molecule is too large and unstable to inject quickly. It is large because Earth's gravity creates defects when the crystal forms, limiting how concentrated and uniform the final drug can be. Merck, in a collaboration with NASA, grew a higher-quality, easier-to-inject version of the same molecule on the International Space Station, where there is no gravity to interfere. The infusion that could be shorter already exists. It just has to be made in orbit.
Antariksh Parichha read roughly 300 papers. Then he started a company.
Serendipity Space was founded in 2024 in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, alongside Jivitesh Debata and Dr. Monica Ekal, who brings research experience from Germany's DLR and NASA. They call themselves a pharma company that goes to space, not a space company doing pharma. The distinction is intentional and precise.
In March 2026, the team flew Alchemy, their autonomous pharmaceutical factory, on a stratospheric balloon in partnership with TIFR's Balloon Facility in Hyderabad. The system executed drug crystallization processes in near-space conditions, preserved the crystals through re-entry, and the payload was recovered intact. The first experiment of its kind conducted in India. The balloon is not orbit and near-space is not true microgravity, but the hardware worked, the avionics worked, and the recovery capsule worked. What flew over Hyderabad was proof that Alchemy survives the journey to where it needs to go.
"On Earth, gravity disrupts crystallisation, creating defects that reduce solubility and effectiveness. In microgravity, these constraints disappear," Parichha said.
From pre-seed funding in July 2025 to near-space demonstration took less than twelve months.
Somewhere in India tonight, a cancer patient is connected to a six-hour infusion. The molecule inside it was already made better in space nine years ago. Antariksh Parichha is building the factory that makes it that way at scale.
His parents chose the right name.
