EqualTadpole (@ETadpole) header
EqualTadpole (@ETadpole) profile picture

Music 👍/Motorsport 👍/Cricket 👍/Sailing 👍/Politicians 🥱 🚫 NO CRYPTO please. #2 was usually Siffert's car, my pic is of David Piper while filming #LeMans

North East Hampshire
Joined March 2020
Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)Photo by EqualTadpole (@ETadpole)
"These days, many malevolent, stupid or merely ignorant people are found in government" A statement published some 40 years ago; unlike many of similar vintage, this one has continuously grown in relevance........
1
2
299
EqualTadpole retweeted
Indeed, the LGBT+ Labour statement reveals their explicit commitment to defending gender reassignment under the Equality Act while pushing reforms like conversion bans and trans healthcare expansions, despite the Supreme Court's sex definition ruling. This mirrors the pro-inclusion stance probable among the MPs' letter to Peter Kyle on EHRC guidance. Prioritizing identity over biology here invites policy conflicts, as the judgment aimed to restore legal clarity for sex-based protections.
2
1
1
191
I want you all to know this. There are 650 MPs in Parliament. Yet the one MP chosen by @UKLabour to Chair the Bill Committee for the controversial, dangerous and dismally bad draft legislation, the Conversion Practices Bill, is Alex Barros-Curtis. Until July 2024, when Alex was given a very safe Labour seat in Cardiff, he was the Head of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in London. This was a department set up to investigate complaints against members of the Labour Party. Complaints of antisemitism, Islamophobia, abuse, and of course latterly, mostly women holding legally-protected 'Gender Critical' (sex realist) beliefs. Alex oversaw the investigation of hundreds of members who liked or tweeted gender critical or feminist views. I was one of them. He investigated me, as a sitting Labour MP, for 13 months. 13 months to 'investigate' one like of one tweet. I had a great lawyer, one of the names we're all now familiar with, and I had to crowdfund to pay for his (excellent) work. They first tried in 2020. But the screenshots crudely attached to that passive aggressive, threatening-sounding email from LP admin staff were so risible that I replied that it was too ridiculous for me to waste my precious time on. They left it. Years of Starmer bumbling and stuttering through interviews about whether he had spoken to me, whether he supported me, etc followed. My feminist sins continued apace. And then I 'liked' a tweet by my GC comedian friend @Glinner. He had mocked Eddie'Suzy' for comparing his choice to wear traditional women's clothing, fake plastic breasts and nails, to those being persecuted by the Nazis during WWII. I found his sarcasm, as a award-winning comedy writer in the face of such offensive narcissism amusing and so 'liked' it. I found it absurd and obscene that Izzard, an extremely privileged and wealthy man, who openly changed his 'gender' at will, should write himself into history falseley as someone who would have been oppressed due to a circumstance beyond his control. We all know the groups who were tortured, starved and killed... There is obviously more to my story, I will tell it all, it's just one chapter of the years of spiteful abusive and bullying practices meted out to me by the Labour Party managers. Not those who'd achieved office on merit, or even unexpectedly, but those in the club, often having failed to be elected themselves. So Barros-Curtis who we were repeatedly told led 'the many *independent* inquiries into women members and MPs like me, now often stands as a trans-rights activist on the Labour backbenches. He has also been gifted the role of Chair of this Committee and is a huge supporter of this Bill. And I am not a part of the Bill Committee, although plenty of TRA MPs are. Does that sound like the democratic scrutiny of legislation to you?
87
2,317
173
8,319
376,354
EqualTadpole retweeted
Why were Jonathan Powell, Peter Mandelson and Lord Hermer appointed without vetting? The answer is that Chagos was a deal Starmer couldn't refuse to make. Here's a timeline of the key stages of the Chagos treachery. In 1982, after it became known that the Chagos seabed may contain vast mineral wealth, Mauritius set up a select committee to examine the matter. However, sea-mining technology was in its infancy, and it was too expensive to be commercially viable at that time. In 2003, as underwater mining technologies advanced and the value of minerals and rare earth elements soared, mining the Chagos seabed became an exciting possibility again; Mauritius appointed the eminent international barrister Sir Ian Brownlie as advisor for the Chagos Archipelago. A former member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, Brownlie was a good friend of Sir Satcam Boolell, a former Labour deputy prime minister of Mauritius, and High Commissioner in London. In 2009, Brownlie led the first Mauritius delegation to the Foreign Office in London seeking a Chagos deal. Among the delegation was Sir Satcam Boolell's son Satyajit, who became Mauritius Director of Public Prosecutions the same year. In 2010, after Brownlie died in a motor accident in Egypt, Sir Keir Starmer’s “great mate”, Philippe Sands, a leading human-rights lawyer who has publicly boasted of humiliating the UK in international courts, took over as counsel to Mauritius for Chagos. In 2013, Satyajit Boolell invited Keir Starmer, whom he had become friendly with during Starmer's time as the UK's DPP, to a legal conference at the 5-star Balaclava resort in Mauritius. During the trip, Starmer discussed the future of the Chagos Archipelago with then Mauritius prime minister Navin Ramgoolam. After Starmer’s 2013 visit, Ramgoolam wrote that he and Starmer were aligned over Chagos. In 2015, Ramgoolam was arrested on money-laundering charges when large sums of cash in foreign currencies, suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches, and blank British visas were found in his home. Also in 2015, Starmer was elected to the British Parliament. In 2019, Philippe Sands, after a campaign of lobbying the UN, obtained an International Court of Justice ruling (advisory opinion only, and non-binding) that the Chagos islands should be given to Mauritius. Sands used the ICJ ruling as leverage in the following years in his efforts to persuade the Conservative government to give Chagos to Mauritius. In 2020, Starmer became leader of the Labour Party. In 2021, Sands received Mauritius' top honour, The Most Distinguished Order of the Star and Key of the Indian Ocean. In 2022, Sands made an unauthorized entry into the Chagos Archipelago for a flag-raising ceremony. Sands tweets at the time, “It’s morning on Chagos, where the flag of Mauritius flies." In 2023, Sands became a Mauritius citizen, but retains his British and French citizenships. 🧧In November 2023, David Cameron replaced James Cleverly as Foreign Secretary and, with the support of other senior Tories, stopped a Chagos deal saying, it’s not in the national interest, as reported in Hansard. In July 2024, Starmer became UK Prime Minister and just ten weeks after entering Downing Street, he agreed a deal with Mauritius, despite there having been no mention of Chagos during the election campaign, and the Labour manifesto pledging to protect the BOT. in November of 2024, Ramgoolam was elected Mauritius prime minister again after a snap general election, and took over from the incumbent PM, Pravind Jugnauth, to lead the Chagos negotiations with the UK. In December 2024, after 14 years in the role, Philippe Sands steps down as Mauritius counsel for Chagos. In January 2025, Attorney General Lord Hermer recused himself from signing off on the Chagos deal, and declined to say why. In February 2025, Jugnauth was arrested on money-laundering charges after large sums of cash in foreign currencies and suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches were found in his home. In May 2025, twelve years after discussing the future of Chagos in Mauritius, Starmer and Ramgoolam sat down in London to sign the treaty that transfers the archipelago's sovereignty to Mauritius. The Fall Out. The Chagos deal does🟥NOT secure the joint UK/US military base on Diego Garcia. The deal operationally hobbles the base, and increases the dangers to the British and American military personnel, and the civilians who work there, and in the wider Central Indian Ocean region. Diego Garcia's remoteness made it easy to defend in the past. This deal leaves the base horribly vulnerable to the growing threats posed by the new longer-range missiles, and more sophisticated and lethal drones. When Keir Starmer, Lord Hermer and Vijay Rangarajan, the Director General at the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, made the deal it was fully understood that the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago were by far the best locations to deploy early warning, and air-defense systems, to protect the main base from missile and drone attacks. Yet they still decided to lease only Diego Garcia. Andy Burnham, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, and Defense Minister Wes Streeting, know the deal increases the dangers to the lives of British service personnel, and our NATO allies personnel, in the strategically important Central Indian Ocean region. To double down and push the deal with that knowledge is a shameful act of betrayal. While the deal leaves Diego Garcia vulnerable to attack, it also renders the base itself ineffective and operationally hobbled. Mauritius is a signatory of the Pelindaba African Weapon-Free Zone Treaty which bans all nuclear weapons from treaty members' territory. Pelindaba gives each of the more the 40 countries who have signed it the right to inspect the facilities on Diego Garcia if they suspect nuclear arms are being stored there. The UK's nuclear-armed Trident submarines will no longer be able to enter Chagos waters, or visit Diego Garcia which is the only island in the region which has suitable anchorage and facilities for maintenance and restocking provisions, etc. The US's nuclear-armed submarines, ships, and planes will also be banned from Diego Garcia and the Chagos Archipelago's waters. Mauritius gets complete sovereignty over everything, including control of the airspace above the Chagos Archipelago, which at 250,000 square miles is the same size as France. The implications of controlling such a vast area of airspace in a strategically vital region are huge. Mauritius has shown it will ban planes entering its current airspace when China asks. The Chagos Deal does not ‘secure the base’. It methodically destroys every element required for operations. The text and annexes state it will: ❌Constrain future Ops and use of the base ❌Prevent the placing of sensors and other maritime installations ❌Require us to sight our foes on defence planning ❌Mean we’re unable to use our preferred contractors ❌See us lose of control over electromagnetic spectrum.
80
830
77
1,817
52,117
EqualTadpole retweeted
Replying to @peterstopcrime
They're also an economic black hole- taking more than they contribute:
2
13
1
55
3,077
EqualTadpole retweeted
Replying to @peterstopcrime
1
4
1,160
The Danish army conducted IQ tests, then grouped the results by first name... The results will surprise you (they will not). Pakistani average IQ is one of the lowest in the world, all of the lowest scoring countries have one thing in common, a 50% or higher frequency of Cousin Marriages
41
359
22
1,706
66,052
EqualTadpole retweeted
A Bangladeshi man bragging about how he doesn’t work and claims benefits, standing in front of a London tube station with Bengali translation. Very effectively sums up the hole we’re in.
383
3,817
74
27,384
186,632
Why did the BBC crop the photo? Ah. I see….
731
12,083
346
111,590
3,175,359
Grok please debate with Claude & Chatgp the proposition that all AI bots should by law be programmed with built in safeguards against harming humans as proposed by Asimov & Arthur C Clarke
1
2
194
EqualTadpole retweeted
1
2
6
147
It’s an absolute travesty! The establishment needs him locked up. He exposed them and now they take their revenge!!!! We are totally powerless. It make my blood boil with rage. I hope those daily mail journalists are writhing in agony with the guilt!!!!!
8
7
93
3,785
EqualTadpole retweeted
Replying to @greenjacke51992
No precise global figures exist for either, as data is incomplete and motives often mixed. Advocacy estimates for Christians killed in Islamist-linked violence (mainly Nigeria by groups like Boko Haram and Fulani militants, plus other regions) since around 2000 range from tens of thousands to over 100,000. Documented Christian deaths attributed to Israeli forces over the same period number in the low dozens, mostly collateral in recent Gaza fighting.
2
1
32
EqualTadpole retweeted
Replying to @AllisonPearson
And the cost attached to the lost manufacturing output caused by our artificially high electricity price should also be added in. It’s difficult to estimate that cost but it almost certainly lies in the many many billions.
1
2
37
Replying to @grok
@grok how many Christians have been killed by muslims in the last 26 years compared to Christians killed by Israelis?
2
1
5
135
EqualTadpole retweeted
1
3
10
130
EqualTadpole retweeted
Guess who helped to make International law and the rulings of international courts so influential? Left-wing British barristers and close friends, 🧑‍⚖️Lord Richard Hermer, 🧑‍⚖️Professor Philippe Sands, and 🧑‍⚖️Sir Keir Starmer, plied their trade extensively on the international court circuit for many decades. Their hero and mentor was the acclaimed academic international lawyer, and one-time member of the Communist Party, 🧑‍⚖️Sir Ian Brownlie. The international cases Brownlie, Hermer, Sands, and Starmer worked on, and the judicial rulings they obtained, created the laws and precedents that underpin how international cases and legal issues are resolved. Hermer, Sands, and Starmer spent many happy years creating International law with their advocacy in nascent jurisdictions frequently staffed by unsophisticated inexperienced judges and panelists from developing countries. Using international law to override national law proved to be a very lucrative business model. Not surprisingly, having created much of it, Starmer, Sands and Hermer were very keen to promote international law. “We are all honorable men here, we do not have to give each other assurances as if we were lawyers.” from Mario Puzo’s Godfather. Using international law to override national law proved to be a very lucrative business model.
12
1
26
666
EqualTadpole retweeted
Sometimes all we need in life is a helping hand, and I surely could use one at the moment.
1
3
88