Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop) header
Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop) profile picture

Software development and testing, Scouting, Sailing, Cycling, Walking etc.

United Kingdom
Joined January 2009
Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)Photo by Richard Bishop (@Richardbishop)
Richard Bishop retweeted
The managerial state has officially progressed from chronic dysfunction to terminal, hysterical insanity. Lisa Nandy spent her morning television slot announcing that the government is now seriously looking at banning under-16s from Vinted, eBay, and Depop. Think about the sheer, unhinged absurdity of that sentence: Whitehall’s grand strategy for child protection is deploying state apparatus to stop a fifteen-year-old from selling an old puffer jacket and a pair of trainers. The previous generation were navigating the physical world at fourteen: working Saturday paper rounds, budgeting their own money, meeting mates down the pub, and catching trains across the country without a GPS tracker tethered to their skull. Today, the administrative class has constructed a suffocating digital panopticon where young people cannot develop an ounce of financial independence, commercial literacy, or personal resilience without a civil servant demanding their biometric telemetry. The descent into full nanny-state authoritarianism is always bipartisan. The Conservatives spent five years drafting the lumbering Frankenstein known as the Online Safety Act, and Labour has taken that framework and weaponised it into a blanket ban on childhood agency. First it was social media bans for under-16s; then it was age-assurance regimes demanding facial estimation scans and credit card verification just to read an article online; now a teenager listing a second-hand hoodie on an e-commerce platform is officially treated as an unmanageable safeguarding hazard. Over 1.5 million young people in this country run small-scale circular-economy trades on platforms like Vinted and Depop, learning the basics of supply, postage, and commerce before they even sit their GCSEs. The bureaucratic solution to any potential risk is never policing actual criminals or holding platforms to basic moderation standards; it is a scorched-earth administrative prohibition that infantilises an entire generation until the day they turn eighteen. We are systematically raising a demographic hermetically sealed from real-world interaction, financial literacy, and basic human friction, and then expressing institutional bewilderment when twenty-somethings arrive in the workplace crippled by anxiety and entirely dependent on the state. If a British teenager cannot even be trusted to post an old coat via Evri without Whitehall requiring an age audit, we haven’t protected them. We have built an open-air nursery overseen by terrified bureaucrats who view the mere act of growing up as an intolerable administrative risk.
39
153
19
579
16,773
Richard Bishop retweeted
Best description I've heard of Labour's tax on private schools: "A tax that raises less than it costs isn’t a tax. It’s spite with a spreadsheet. Aimed at the parents who sacrificed, and dressed up as fairness." Businessman Alex Lovén in Times interview.
77
626
14
3,075
53,696
Richard Bishop retweeted
In December 1952, Londoners navigated four days through a lethal, sulphur-choked pea-souper so thick you couldn't see your own shoes, and cinema screens were obscured inside the auditorium. In 2026, the Met Office sees three clouds hovering near Birmingham and issues a multi-county emergency alert for the harrowing atmospheric crisis known as "autumn mist".
1
4
30
3,679
Richard Bishop retweeted
This is not a sensible regulatory tweak; it is the panicked, humiliated collapse of state-mandated central planning colliding at full speed with physical and economic reality. Under the Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate, Whitehall bureaucrats constructed an administrative extortion racket. They decreed that car manufacturers must hit ruthless annual electric quotas, stepping up toward 80 percent by 2030, or hand the Treasury a statutory fine of up to £15,000 for every single non-compliant car sold. The British public looked at £50,000 showroom prices, catastrophic battery depreciation, surging insurance costs, and an unreliable public network, and simply refused to buy. Faced with ruinous fines, carmakers were forced into madness: actively choking off the delivery of petrol and diesel cars to British forecourts just to rig their sales percentages. Stellantis, Ford, and Nissan gave Downing Street an ultimatum: dismantle these unworkable targets, or watch UK car plants shut down and thousands of industrial jobs disappear overnight. Labour did not retreat out of sympathy for ordinary families. They blinked because they were staring into an industrial wipeout engineered entirely in Westminster. Cutting the target down toward 50 percent does not save the British motorist. It traps millions of drivers in a deliberate no-man’s-land. The legal ban on the sale of new pure petrol and diesel cars remains on the statute books. Because the state spent years terrifying automakers into starving combustion production lines, the pipeline of reliable, affordable engines has been dismantled. The used car market is being bled dry of affordable family vehicles, forcing working households to hold onto aging cars while local authorities punish them through expanding Clean Air Zones, punitive parking permits, and soaring vehicle excise duty. The entire electrification project was sold on an infrastructural lie. Over 40 percent of households across Britain live in terraced housing or flats with zero private off-street parking. Trailing high-voltage charging cables across public pavements is illegal. The country has barely a third of the public charge points required for mass transition, and the local low-voltage distribution substations buried beneath British streets cannot handle whole neighbourhoods plugging in simultaneously at tea time. The copper in the ground will blow before the physical grid ever supports the spreadsheet fantasies of Whitehall. The trap is already set. As fuel duty receipts inevitably crater, the Treasury will never write off a £30 billion annual hole in the public finances. The inevitable conclusion to this botched transition is universal satellite surveillance and mandatory pay-per-mile road pricing. They engineered a vehicle famine, devastated domestic manufacturing, failed to lay the copper for the grid, and now intend to tax your basic right to travel by the yard. Managed decline is no longer an administrative accident. It is government policy. #EVtargets #ZEVMandate #WhitehallAudit #CostOfLiving
37
260
31
802
25,881
Richard Bishop retweeted
I read the reports coming out of Manchester this morning and I am genuinely speechless. Andy Burnham’s old political machine has just been caught secretly intercepting and censoring emails sent by the public to elected politicians. What were those emails actually about? A resident was asking hard questions about the £55 million in taxpayer loans Burnham handed to Abu Dhabi property developers when he was Mayor, with zero affordable housing requirements. Instead of letting elected councillors read the concerns of their constituents, unelected bureaucrats quietly diverted the emails straight to the legal department to be buried. The politicians had absolutely no idea their personal inboxes were being filtered by the state. The council claims they had to intercept the messages because of potential litigation. It is a complete lie. Internal correspondence proves the city solicitor asked for this specific resident to be blocked months before any legal threat even existed. You vote for local representatives to hold the system accountable. But the second a citizen asks where Burnham sent public money in a Gulf state property deal, his political syndicate builds a secret digital firewall to protect the investment. This is not a functioning democracy. This is a captured corporate cartel running a cover-up for the Prime Minister, and the national media is letting them get away with it in broad daylight.
440
4,775
364
9,124
332,964
Richard Bishop retweeted
It is frankly very worrying that Labour is granting energy firms access to everyone's tax records. This information will invariably fall into the wrong hands and be used for criminal and other nefarious purposes. It's not just tax information but also child benefit records, property valuations, and benefits and pension records that will be made available to countless people in multiple energy companies. This is a very bad plan.
81
402
35
1,166
31,724
Richard Bishop retweeted
They know they've screwed everything up, so now they're preparing the propaganda machine to pretend it isn't happening.
JUST IN: 🇬🇧 BBC prepares emergency radio studio with 100 staff to broadcast government messages in the event of major infrastructure failure.
11
42
2
234
4,256
Richard Bishop retweeted
Thankfully, as long as we can keep data centre away from central government, it shouldn't matter. Leeds City Council backs data centres. So does our Mayor. If we can protect local planning powers, Richard Burgon's degrowth views shouldn't matter. 🤞
The sad irony of this is: - the Leeds data centre is estimated to create 1,000+ jobs across the region - its water needs are roughly equivalent to 5 moderately busy car washes - and... it will use rainwater gathering, so a decent chunk of water needs are covered anyway Objecting to it essentially makes the region poorer, for no real gain.
8
11
1
196
10,548
Richard Bishop retweeted
Don’t be fooled by the boring diplomatic language in the leaked UK-EU draft statement. Under Point 65, Brussels is attempting a massive regulatory hijack of the UK’s highest-growth sectors—specifically AI, quantum computing, and advanced semiconductors.
22
395
57
1,303
75,092
Richard Bishop retweeted
There is a group on the left hell bent on making sure that Britain miss every single technological boat which might improve people’s material condition or improve productivity
Great to join the protest in Leeds against the proposed new AI data centre. There's huge concerns about the impact of these centres on the environment, infrastructure and people's lives. I've tabled a Parliamentary Motion calling for a national moratorium on new AI data centres.
15
13
1
217
3,551
Richard Bishop retweeted
A bunch of Labour MPs have summoned the head of train network c2c to Westminster to complain about the fact that delays have considerably worsened since Labour nationalised the service. Before it was nationalised 94% of c2c trains arrived within five minutes of the scheduled time. The latest available data from this August shows this had dropped to just under 71.5%. Other Labour MPs are complaining about their own local nationalised train service. “It is unacceptable that in rural areas like ours, we can’t rely on train services being on time or in some cases, even running at all,” said Terry Jermy, the Labour MP for South West Norfolk, of nationalised Greater Thameslink Railway. Labour MPs should have realised that nationalisation always leads to worse service and higher taxpayer costs before they voted for it. 1/2
17
57
6
175
3,073
Replying to @RichardBurgon
What's the argument here against data centers? It appears to me that it will ensure the UK are behind all other competing countries (just like what's already happened with the technology industry here already) Yes, we don't want them built in unsuitable areas but surely we want them somewhere?
4
1
1
40
2,748
Richard Bishop retweeted
The biggest infrastructure build in human history is underway. And our politicians are marching against it. Generational decline incoming.
Great to join the protest in Leeds against the proposed new AI data centre. There's huge concerns about the impact of these centres on the environment, infrastructure and people's lives. I've tabled a Parliamentary Motion calling for a national moratorium on new AI data centres.
70
61
3
572
18,059
Richard Bishop retweeted
"When a fool gains power, the first thing he does is silence the wise. The next thing he does is gather other fools around him. The final thing he does is destroy the nation." ~ PLATO
151
1,329
34
3,980
25,766
Richard Bishop retweeted
Schrodinger's North Sea. Insignificant and in terminal decline while at the same time so large and dangerous we must ban any further exploration.
Pure denial. The UK’s production of oil and gas has fallen by more than 75% this century and is in terminal decline.
26
209
3
1,393
14,488
Richard Bishop retweeted
So to her great credit did my mother, fortunately she tells me she laughed out loud at my gaffe for which I have apologised.
I had a little chuckle at the opening paragraph of Jacob Rees-Mogg's latest piece.
90
406
17
7,605
259,714
Richard Bishop retweeted
Winter is approaching And with wind and solar managing just 1/25th (4%) of our electricity needs between them, 87% of our power right now comes from gas (70%) and nuclear (17%) They are the reliable dependable sources. So why bother with solar and wind at all? They are flibbertigibbets! Here today, gone tomorrow. Unreliable..and needing constant backup from gas and nuclear. Junk them!
27
119
6
268
3,517
Richard Bishop retweeted
A single nuclear power plant produces as much power as 5000 wind turbines & does it when the wind is not blowing.
Donc: une seule centrale nucléaire produit sensiblement autant que la moitié des 10 000 éoliennes françaises. Cela permet de mieux réaliser l'absurdité du bilan intérêt/saccage des paysages de cette industrie parasite.
54
355
6
1,478
11,044
Richard Bishop retweeted
Russell Brand was a columnist for the ultra-woke publication The Guardian. He also spoke in some capacity for Turning Point, which is a right wing conservative platform. Here's the difference. When Brand was embraced by the left and fawned over by people like Owen Jones and George Monbiot, it was at a time when he was known and celebrated for being a womaniser and a sex pest. He was crowned "shagger of the year" three years in a row, he went on a radio show and mocked a national treasure by bragging about having sex with his granddaughter, and was invited onto flagship shows on the BBC to giggle and titter about his promiscuous ways. He was also gushed over by the left for being a junkie. In other words, the left loved him when he represented degeneracy. But then he disappeared from the limelight for a few years, left his addictions behind him and got more disciplined, discovering Christianity and practicing martial arts. That's when the right started to listen to what he had to say. In other words, the right gave him the time of day when he was apparently a reformed character who cleaned up his act. In my personal opinion, he was never really either of these two things. He was never funny as a comedian, he was never a good performer as an actor, he was just a charismatic, glorified TV presenter, a grifter who played up to certain caricatures in order to make a generous living from whatever idiot corporation was willing to pay him a fat salary. But regardless of who he hoodwinked, you can't escape the fact that the Russell Brand saga makes a good analogy for the left/right divide. The left couldn’t get enough of him when he was a promiscuous, drug-addled dickhead, whilst the right only became interested when he appeared to have grown up, kicked his addictions and discovered a bit of morality, which tells us a lot about the values of the modern left and the modern right, and the sort of people each side considers worthy of admiration.
135
391
30
2,704
115,131