Undeference retweeted
War reporting used to be:
- Someone makes a claim.
- You demand evidence.
- You check the facts.
- You question your sources.
- You apply the same standards to everyone.
- You publish only what you can verify.
War reporting in 2026:
Undeference retweeted
It says a lot about the “expert” class that they had to completely redefine what words meant to justify their claims about Gaza.
Changed the definition of genocide, famine, and almost every other accusation to justify lobbing them.
Now they are utterly discredited.
De Waal declared a famine somewhere that received record war zone aid per capita. The result has been a population in relatively better health than many surrounding countries. So now he has to invent a new version of “famine” that relates to some subjective view of dignity instead of objective measurements on food insecurity and malnutrition.
Undeference retweeted
There's something exquisitely ridiculous about listening to the British lecture Israel and Jews on religious equality and democratic citizenship.
Israel, the Jewish nation-state, has no established state religion, no religious qualification for its president or prime minister, and no hereditary religious monarch. Jewish, Muslim, Christian and Druze citizens can vote, serve in the Knesset, hold government office and participate in the country's political life.
Israel's Declaration of Independence explicitly promises equal social and political rights to citizens regardless of religion, race or sex.
Now, let's visit Britain, that magnificent self-appointed guardian of enlightened democratic values, shall we?
🤡Britain actually has an established church.
Not metaphorically. Not culturally. Not because someone hung a crucifix in a government office. An actual church, established by law, with the monarch serving as its Supreme Governor.
🤡Twenty-six Anglican bishops are entitled to seats in the House of Lords simply because they're Anglican bishops.They can debate legislation, propose amendments and vote on laws governing Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Catholics, atheists and everyone else.
Do rabbis get 26 reserved seats? No.
Imams? No.
Catholic bishops? Absolutely not.
🤡England still has a legal requirement for daily collective worship in state-funded schools. In ordinary nonreligious state schools, worship is required to be Christian.
🤡The British monarch must be Protestant and in communion with the Church of England.
So the next time someone declares that Israel's Jewish national identity is inherently incompatible with democracy, perhaps they could explain why Britain's formally established Anglican church, constitutionally Protestant monarchy and parliamentary bishops supposedly present no comparable problem.
Better still, they could explain why Jewish national self-determination is treated as inherently suspect while Britain's centuries-old religious establishment is waved away as charming tradition.
One might almost begin to suspect that the objection isn't really to the principle at all. 🤔
Undeference retweeted
This is written in anger. Today @bbcnews put out a propaganda piece demonising Israel. Think about the timing. October 8. They must have had this one lined up especially. It is not news. It just rehashes old stories without any evidence at all - and it gets worse 1/5
Undeference retweeted
This was Zohran Mamdani only 13 days after October 7. No one could have predicted that this unhinged radical would become New York's next mayor. Israel had not yet launched its ground invasion into Gaza and he was already screaming genocide
tnx @mazemoore for that video
Undeference retweeted
How anti-Israeli is Wikipedia?
So anti-Israeli that on October 7, October 7 is not mentioned.
Undeference retweeted
GeoConfirmed conflictmap 7OCT23.
Exactly three years ago, our volunteers were confronted with emerging information and the first footage coming out of Israel and the border with Gaza. Although it took Western media more than a week to grasp the full scale of what happened on 7 October, our volunteers quickly realised that something horrific was unfolding.
While Israel initially provided very little communication about the attacks, Hamas propaganda was operating at full capacity. Many Western audiences encountered the conflict only when the IDF began bombing Gaza, without fully understanding why. This highlights a crucial lesson governments should draw from the conflict: do not allow your adversary to dominate the information environment.
While accounts such as Syrian Girl, WarMonitor (Suspended by X in May 2024), along with many others, downplayed Hamas’s role and focused, sometimes through the spread of disinformation, on the IDF, it became increasingly clear to our volunteers what had happened: This was the deadliest terrorist attack in Israel’s history.
For this reason, we created a dedicated map of the 7 October attacks, compiling all the geolocated footage we could find: geoconfirmed.org/map/7oct
Even today, media outlets often refer to it simply as a “Hamas attack,” but it was far larger than Hamas alone. We identified several militant groups, most of which are designated as terrorist organisations by the European Union. The groups involved included the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s military wing; the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades; the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP); the Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades; the Al-Quds Brigades, the military wing of Palestinian Islamic Jihad; the Palestinian Mujahideen Movement; the Mujahideen Brigades; Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ); and others.
GeoConfirmed’s footage made clear that these groups operated in their own designated areas. Journalists who attribute the attacks solely to Hamas do not tell the full story.
Our team has analysed more than 100,000 videos and other pieces of footage from various conflicts, and some of the most disturbing material we have encountered was recorded during the 7 October attacks.
Below is only a small fraction of that footage.
More footage is available on our website.
THIS FOOTAGE IS NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART. However, we believe it is our responsibility to show the context in which Israel’s response took place.
If you notice footage that has not yet been geolocated, or if you have seen footage that is not yet included on the map, please do not hesitate to let us know.
This post is not, in any way, an endorsement of how the IDF responded to the attack.
As lead volunteer Admin of the GeoConfirmed Project I would like to thank all the volunteers involved once again for their hard work and dedication.
THANK YOU!
More information: geoconfirmed.org/map/7oct
(1/9)
Undeference retweeted
Brett McGurk, one of the Biden administration’s most senior officials, was interviewed on Dan Senor’s podcast (full disclosure, etc.) and rebutted a long list of claims and myths regarding the hostage deal. It is very much worth listening to, especially given that he served in an administration that clashed with Israel to the point of imposing an arms embargo.
Brett McGurk’s five main points about the negotiations to free the hostages:
1. “They could have brought everyone home almost immediately” — McGurk: absolute bullshit
According to him, a comprehensive deal in the early stages would effectively have required surrendering to Hamas’s terms, and even then there was no reason to assume Hamas would release everyone. The U.S. assessment was that Hamas intended to hold some of the hostages for years as bargaining chips.
2. The first deal collapsed because of Hamas — and the dispute was over the young women
McGurk says Hamas tried to move on to releasing older men while it was still holding young women alive. From Israel’s perspective, agreeing to skip over them could have amounted to a death sentence for those women. Israel therefore insisted on completing that category, and Hamas stopped the releases.
3. Before the Rafah operation, there was no deal that Hamas was prepared to accept
According to McGurk, Israel agreed to several very difficult proposals, including the release of prisoners convicted of serious offenses, and Hamas rejected them. Hamas also did not accept the Israeli proposal that Biden publicly announced. McGurk stresses that there was no point before Rafah when a deal was truly within reach. Moreover, Hamas would have waited years before releasing everyone.
4. Biden’s pressure to stop before Rafah was not because Israel had torpedoed a deal
According to McGurk, by that stage Biden had simply reached the limits of his tolerance for the war and the regional crisis. The U.S. pushed for a reduction in fighting during Ramadan—a move that McGurk says actually reduced Hamas’s incentive to compromise in the negotiations.
5. Sinwar and military pressure were the key
McGurk says that as long as Yahya Sinwar was alive, he saw no realistic possibility of a deal. This includes the killing of the six hostages, an episode that was portrayed here as the government having sacrificed them. The Rafah operation was part of the sequence of events that ultimately led to Sinwar’s killing, and according to McGurk, military pressure was what brought Hamas to the points at which it agreed to deals. In his view, military pressure and a hostage deal were not alternatives—the pressure was the leverage that made the deals possible.
Replying to @EllaTravelsLove
The British still hate Indians.
Undeference retweeted
"Unlike activists and partisans, we don't publish speculation or *unverified information*" 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Our headlines and live coverage contain all the facts we're able to confirm as we confirm them. Unlike activists and partisans, we don't publish speculation or unverified information. Here's a Gift Link to follow along as we update our reporting:
nytimes.com/live/2026/09/30/…
Undeference retweeted
Brace yourselves for the think pieces:
‘Hijacking planes is the language of the oppressed. Maybe we should start listening.’
Replying to @ConceptualJames
Undeference retweeted
the Sun revolves around the Earth (Aristotle)
the Sun revolves around the Earth (Hipparchus)
the Sun revolves around the Earth (Ptolemy)
the Sun revolves around the Earth (Thomas Aquinas)
the Sun revolves around the Earth (Tycho Brahe)
the Sun revolves around the Earth (Christoph Clavius)
the Sun revolves around the Earth (Francesco Ingoli)
the Sun revolves around the Earth (the Roman Inquisition)
"Whatever appears as a motion of the Sun is really due rather to the motion of the Earth" - Nicolaus Copernicus
Wow, look at this fringe crank rejecting the established scientific consensus!
it's genocide (@amnesty )
it's genocide ( @hrw )
it's genocide ( @btselem )
it's genocide ( @MSF )
it's genocide (IAGS)
it's genocide ( @alhaq_org )
it's genocide ( @UNHumanRights )
it's genocide ( @UN_HRC )
it's genocide ( @pchrgaza )
it's genocide ( @AlMezanCenter )
it's genocide ( @WarOnWant )
it's genocide ( @PHRIsrael )
it's genocide ( @fidh_en )
it's genocide (PHROC)
it's genocide ( @LemkinInstitute )
it's genocide ( @theCCR )
it's genocide ( @ECCHRBerlin )
it's genocide ( @unitedforrights )
it's genocide ( @JURDIasso )
it's genocide ( @TheElders )
it's genocide ( @Oxfam )
"As a Jew, it's not genocide because it doesn't fit the definition of genocide I literally just made up right now" - Scott Galloway
Undeference retweeted
Our research has been published in the inaugural issue of the peer-reviewed journal The Digital Hate Review.
We analysed 1,378 articles published between February and May 2024 by eight major news outlets: The Guardian, The New York Times, BBC, CNN, The Washington Post, Reuters, Associated Press, and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
The study examines a gap in journalistic standards in reporting on military conflict, specifically, the reporting of casualty figures in Gaza.
During the most heavily covered war in Gaza’s history, we found a striking asymmetry in the use of sources.
Both principal sources offered incomplete information:
• Gaza’s Hamas-run Ministry of Health reported total deaths, without distinguishing between civilians and combatants.
• Israel reported figures for killed combatants.
Comparing these two sets of data is essential for assessing one of the central questions of the war: the proportion of civilian and combatant casualties.
Yet Israeli figures appeared in only 3% of the articles we analysed. This systematic omission led to removing Hamas combatants from the public picture and reinforced a narrative in which Israel is fighting Gaza’s civilian population alone.
News outlets also increasingly failed to identify primary sources. The Guardian was the clear outlier: in 43% of the articles in which it cited casualty figures from Gaza’s Hamas-run Ministry of Health, it did not identify the source at all.
While the UN sources put disclaimers saying that the data from Gaza still hasn’t been independently verified, this disclaimer is almost absent in the media.
Instead, the figures were presented as self-evident or generally known information. This was the highest rate among all the outlets we analysed.
This imbalance also matters beyond the media. International institutions often treat press reporting as an epistemic authority. For example, when citing the number of killed militants, the UN commission referred to a Guardian article rather than to IDF data.
The Guardian article relied on a database of individually named militants, a figure nearly twice lower than the IDF’s reported total number of killed militants.
Our article examines how these reporting choices can shape an “authoritative version of reality”, and why standards of sourcing, attribution, and context are so important in conflict reporting.
The full article is available:
digitalhatereview.com/articl…
Undeference retweeted
On lit depuis quelques jours, à la suite d'une tribune du Wall Street Journal, que la Cour internationale de Justice s'apprêterait à « redéfinir le génocide » dans l'affaire qui oppose la Gambie au Myanmar au sujet des Rohingyas. Ce n'est pas exact, et il faut commencer par là. Une cour ne réécrit pas un traité. La définition du génocide est celle de la convention de 1948, et elle ne bougera pas. Ce qui peut bouger, en revanche, c'est la manière dont on prouve l'élément qui fait toute la différence : l'intention de détruire un groupe comme tel. Et c'est là que l'affaire birmane rejoint l'affaire de Gaza. (1/8)
Undeference retweeted
On this day—September 7, 1941
The British appeased the Arabs, cancelled the Jewish national home, and locked the last remaining door before the storm.
That day, Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden wrote the quiet part down: “If we must have preferences, let me murmur in your ear that I prefer Arabs to Jews.”
His private secretary recorded the same month that Eden “loves Arabs and hates Jews.” Two years earlier, Chamberlain had already given the order: “If we must offend one side, let us offend the Jews rather than the Arabs.”
That preference became the lock on the door.
The 1939 White Paper capped Jewish immigration at 75,000 over five years, then handed the Arab leadership a veto on anything after that. No Arab consent meant no more Jews. It also meant there would be no Jewish state, just another Arab-majority country with a Jewish minority under a leadership that had already denied Jews any right to live there. When the Peel Commission asked the Mufti in 1937 what should happen to the roughly 400,000 Jews then in the country if Britain simply handed him the keys, British officials in the room understood the answer: expulsion or worse. The 1936–39 Arab revolt was rewarded. The Mandate’s purpose was cancelled. The last sanctuary was closed.
What the policy looked like:
September 2, 1939: a British cutter opened fire on the Tiger Hill ship and her 1,400 Jewish refugees. Zvi Binder and Dr. Robert Schneider were killed. The rest were interned.
July 1941: British codebreakers began reading German police traffic from the East proving mass shootings of Jews with body counts in the thousands. The Holocaust by Bullets was not just a rumor inside the government. The White Paper stayed in force.
February 1942: the Struma. A converted cattle barge left Romania with about 790 Jews fleeing the killings, 103 of them children. The engine died. The ship sat for weeks in Istanbul. Britain refused to issue certificates for Mandate Palestine. Turkey towed the unseaworthy hulk into the Black Sea and cut it loose. The next day, a Soviet submarine sank it. One passenger survived. The rest drowned. London already had the shooting reports for seven months. It still said no.
August 1942: the Riegner telegram reached the Foreign Office informing the British of what came to be known as the “Final Solution” — a plan to industrialize the murder millions of Jews in German-controlled Europe with poison gas.
December 1942: the Allied governments publicly acknowledged the mass murder of the Jews of Europe. The quota did not move.
1945: the camps were liberated. The world saw the films of what Allied soldiers found inside. The policy still did not move.
1946–49: the Royal Navy intercepted more than 50 ships. Most of the refugees were sent to internment on Cyprus. They put 52,000 Holocaust survivors behind British wire. Guards still shot escapees after Israel declared independence. One ship was singled out to make an example. In July 1947, 4,515 survivors on Exodus 1947 were boarded in international waters, beaten, transferred to prison ships, and sent to Germany (!!).
Britain did not merely “restrict immigration.” It fired on the ships, interned the remnant, and returned people to the country that exterminated their families.
They did not learn it in 1945 and then close the door.
They had the mass shooting reports before the Struma went down.
They had the industrialized extermination warning while the war was still on, and kept the veto anyway.
After the proof was on film, they still stopped the ships.
The file is not a misunderstanding. It is Eden’s handwriting.
Undeference retweeted
Calling Israel’s war “genocide” because a column of NGOs typed the same two words is not analysis.
It is the same trick eugenics used: get enough letterheads in a room and treat the pile as proof.
Harvard taught eugenics.
Carnegie and Rockefeller funded it.
The Supreme Court blessed it.
30 states wrote it into law.
Doctors called it public health.
They sterilized the poor, the disabled, and anyone who failed their test. Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Carrie Buck was not an imbecile. She was poor. They defined “unfit,” measured the people they had already condemned, then cited the measurement. Garbage in. Policy out.
A chorus is not a fact.
French generals were sure Dreyfus was guilty. He was framed.
Vienna’s obstetricians were sure unwashed hands did not kill mothers. The mothers kept dying.
Soviet academies were sure Lysenko had beaten Mendel. The harvests failed.
The UN voted that Zionism was racism. The vote was real. The sentence was a lie.
Textbooks were sure ulcers were stress. It was a bacterium.
The State Department called Nazis’ industrialized murder of the Jews of Europe a “rumor” while the pits were already full.
Genocide is a legal word. It means intent to destroy a people as such.
It does not mean civilian dead in a war against an enemy that hides in hospitals.
It does not mean a list of logos used the same headline.
Seoul, Mosul, Raqqa: same urban ruin, same civilian toll. The word showed up when the army was Jewish.
Eugenics had the deans, the foundations, and the Court.
It was still a fraud.
Read the Convention.
Count the intent.
Ignore the pile.

































