Stand Against Child Porn and Child Rape
Joined May 2023
- Tweets36.8K
- Following1.6K
- Followers4.2K
- Likes3.4K
On a scale of 1-10, this sucks ass.
Watch Episode 1 of our Odyssey series made with Grok Imagine.
Let us know in the comments if you'd like a full breakdown of how it was done!
Creative collaboration with @WonderStudiosX and director Dev Walker @glumlot_
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
This is a testament to the hopelessness of generative AI based on human training data to be creative.
This is a statistical hologram of every version of the Odyssey Elon could steal. This is the midpoint of all the junk related to the story in its training data—every crappy Youtube video, B-movie, and school play, all mushed together.
Everything you see from these things is mathematically mid. It has no understanding of what it’s depicting. It’s just illuminating our own exhaust. Nothing is being created.
It’s like the first time humans saw movies—of a train coming into a station. They thought a real train was coming through the screen and ran away.
That’s what’s happening with AI. Once you see slop for what it is, you will never be afraid of it again.
Watch Episode 1 of our Odyssey series made with Grok Imagine.
Let us know in the comments if you'd like a full breakdown of how it was done!
Creative collaboration with @WonderStudiosX and director Dev Walker @glumlot_
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
SpaceX Blocked A U.S. And NATO Satellite to Assist a Russian Intercept After Crippling Ukraine's Air Defenses
The Math Proves the Reality that Musk doesn't want you to see.
On Oct 13-14, SpaceX restricted Starshield/Starlink during a 39-missile Russian attack, cutting Ukrainian drone intercepts by 23% and stranding U.S. personnel in Kyiv. Forty-eight hours later (Oct 15), SpaceX blocked U.S.-licensed NRO, Space Force, and NATO radar satellite ICEYE-X36 in orbit so Russia's COSMOS 2612 weapon could intercept it (99.89%-99.98% posterior)
Our Model Demonstrates that the Russian intercept of the US/NATO ICEYE X-36 satellite (contemporaneous with the throttling of Starlink) would not have been possible, and almost certainly not been attempted, without SpaceX resources. At a material opportunity cost, Russia sprinted its COSMOS satellite to intercept ICEYE X36. Based on a previous attempt in June during which X36 maneuvered to evade COSMOS, Russia knew that this would be successful only if X36 could not maneuver. On October 15, SpaceX fixed X36 in place by issuing a collision alert for a sub-kilometer approach with its Starlink 35856 when SpaceX's own data shows that the actual distance was 4.8-5.0x as great. SpaceX issued no warning to COSMOS despite the fact that its sprint was far more threatening than the stable X36 orbit. SpaceX did not maneuver its Starlink 35856 satellite to clear the supposed collision risk. How, absent coordination with SpaceX, could Russia have known that SpaceX would take actions that (a) misrepresented the danger posed by X36, and (b) resulted in the fixing of X36 thereby enabling COSMOS's successful intercept? Thus, SpaceX was directly involved in simultaneously compromising Ukraine’s defensive and offensive capabilities. The conjunction of these two events makes innocent explanations untenable.
The Pentagon Capture & Iran Round Two Trap: Pentagon CTO Emil Michael who cashed out $7M–$35M from Musk’s inner-circle SpaceX vehicles (M8/Gigafund 0.1 and M6/Valor M33 II) and KQ Partners / xAI (selling xAIfor $5M–$25M three days before taking over CDAO/OSCand 21 days before SpaceX bought xAI, while keeping M8, M6, M9, M10 & Nomadic open) and Pete Hegseth purged rival Anthropic in two hours, surrendered combat command over US drones used to attack Iran to Starlink’s "Terms of Service," and on October 2 named Musk Co-Director of Project Meridian to design the Pentagon's "Future of Warfighting" just as America enters Iran Round Twowith depleted Patriot/THAAD magazines and Russia feeding U.S. warship/aircraft locations to Tehran.
SpaceX’s actions in Ukraine raise serious questions about its alignment with US security interests and its reliability as a cornerstone of US defense. These questions are particularly troubling given the effectively irreplaceable position SpaceX has been granted by the Hegseth/Emil Michael Pentagon.
$SPCX $TSLA
Our full quantitative analysis below w/ @streetwiseprof
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
Elon is deliberately trying to pop the AI bubble and crash the stock market because he thinks he can pick up one of the labs and get plenty of compute for cheap in the aftermath. He knows the hyperscalers and labs have no moat anyway, so he’s kicking the legs out from under the whole thing.
Mark my words. He hasn’t suddenly realized the AI market is smoke and mirrors. He’s under pressure from the Starlink situation and he’s making a move to kill the chatbot industry because he thinks he’s in a position to rule over the ashes.
He’s not wrong. He’s just right for the wrong reasons.
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
$SPCX is burning a MASSIVE amount of cash. The ONLY reason it's "investment grade" (for now) is its "equity cushion" of bubble-stock. When that deflates, so will your "grade."
Pretty much.
As of the past few weeks, debt markets have almost entirely shut off access to money for any company that doesn’t have substantial revenue independent of AI data centers.
SpaceX closed $40B of debt for GPUs, but we’re investment grade and have Starlink & launch revenue.
That means the 200+ neoclouds are going to see guppy-level death and consolidation. Some will make it through, but not many.
Elon Musk is a random statement generator:
AI Data Centers
Chip Fabs
Mineral Mining
Humanoid Robots
with
In Space
On The Moon
On Mars
In Your Mom
Elon wants chip fabs on the Moon now. Lunar soil is 20% silicon, he says, so you just mine it, refine it, stamp out solar cells and chips. Next level of the video game. His words.
He's a walking 1954 Popular Science cover. "Moon Factories by 1975!" You can picture him red-faced at some poor SpaceX engineer, jabbing a finger at a render: "I saw this in a magazine! Why can't you guys do this?" Because the magazine was fiction, Elon. That's why.
Boring question one: water. A single leading-edge fab burns through millions of gallons of ultrapure water every day, the kind filtered and polished until it turns chemically aggressive and rips ions out of anything it touches. Making it takes an industrial plant of its own. On the Moon you'd be chipping ice out of permanently shadowed craters at minus 230 C and feeding it through a purification chain that doesn't exist, powered by energy that also doesn't exist.
Boring question two: shaking. Lithography machines sit on tuned vibration isolation, springs and masses and counterweights engineered around Earth's gravity down to the millimeter. Lunar gravity is one sixth of that. Every spring rate and tuned mass in the stack assumes 1 g, and the Moon has its own moonquakes nobody has fully mapped. So forget shipping a fab up there. You'd have to redesign the entire physics package from scratch, in a hailstorm of charged abrasive dust that eats seals and bearings for breakfast.
And here's the part that makes it funny instead of just dumb. NASA studied all of this while Elon was still in college. Ignatiev and Freundlich published the actual paper in 1991: waste silicon from regolith processing, vacuum-deposited thin-film cells laid right on the surface. Serious work, fifteen years of it, and by 2005 the best anyone could promise was 5-8% efficient cells sprayed on melted moon glass, economical only at megawatt scale. Chips? Never in the plan. Not once, in thirty years of study. Then a 2006 follow-up walked back even the crude version, because melted regolith is too lumpy and dirty to make a decent substrate. The 2025 research gave up on purifying lunar silicon entirely and just ships the semiconductor layer from Earth.
Thirty years of papers saying "hard pass" and this guy shows up with the crayon version of a 1991 NASA study, calls it visionary, and the fanboys clap like he invented the Moon. He isn't a genius ahead of his time. He's a man who skips the reading, and it shows every single time he opens his mouth just to pump his cult stocks.
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
Not up for an Ackman-sized tweet, but this is what I'm seeing:
- Early voting is swinging massively towards Ds
- Ds are not friendly to AI and data centers
- Trump loses midterms, he is going to obliterate Iran
- Oil goes to $200, a genuine energy crisis
- Reserves depleted to get it down
- Credit spreads ripping higher
- The usual concerns about private credit/insurers
If stocks were ever to drop, it will probably happen in the next few weeks
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
OK, I see. In his degenerating mind, Trump has associated his homoerotic comments with winning in politics. He thinks commenting on Husted’s ass was a winning strategy. This now provides a rationale for his constant admiration of men’s bodies and how “handsome” they are.
So they are running an actual robotaxi service nowhere with Austin 68% being the only place > 50%. Everywhere else is a pathetic taxi service.
Tesla currently ramping unsupervised Robotaxi operations in:
Austin (TX) ~68% of total miles
Dallas (TX) ~ 20% of total miles
Houston (TX) ~ 7% of total miles
Miami (FL) ~ 3% of total miles
Orlando (FL) ~ 1% of total miles
Tampa (FL) ~ 1% of total miles
Tesla currently running supervised Robotaxi operations in:
San Francisco (CA)
Upcoming Robotaxi markets:
San Antonio (TX)
Phoenix (AZ)
Las Vegas (NV)
Jacksonville (FL)
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
I’ve never seen Musk this fucking terrified. Trump lives on flattery and lies, but Musk is unraveling. Why the alleged Starlink slowdown? Why so sloppy? Who benefited? Was Russia pressuring him? What do they have on him? It adds up perfectly if you’ve been paying attention.
Anyone who tells you that Trump 25/65 approve/disapprove + $4.50/gal gas = Republican victory is a worse than a paid shill and probably an enthusiastic supporter of pedophilia.
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
In Texas, breaking down cumulative turnout by precinct buckets paints a pretty stark picture.
In precincts that Harris won by 30% or more, we're at 101% of turnout compared to this point in 2024. 100% of turnout in the 15-30% bucket and 102.5% of turnout for the 0-15% bucket.
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
It has taken days for Musk to come up with a story, and it is palpably false. He claims that Ukraine violated ToS by using Starlink to mount offensive strikes that killed Russian civilians. But Starlink cannot be used for that. This story is particularly disgusting because throttling velocity reduced the effectiveness of Ukrainian defenses--which resulted in the deaths of Ukrainian civilians.
Also, one cannot view the Starlink issue in isolation: there is the simultaneous SpaceX-facilitated intercept of a US operated satellite.
Tomorrow we will update and expand. Elon compels us to do so.
(Post 1/2) How SpaceX's Orbital Information Enabled Russia's Intercept of ICEYE-X36: The Total Risk Exposure to U.S. and NATO Defense
Elon Musk pitches the Pentagon on one core premise: no other company on Earth can match SpaceX's orbital monopoly. He is right, and our latest model proves that exact monopoly sat directly on NATO and Ukrainian spy satellite ICEYE-X36 during Russia's sub-kilometer orbital intercept:
-The Simultaneous Defensive and Offensive Squeeze: On Oct 13 to 14, Musk's Starshield speed cap blinded Ukraine's fast defensive interceptor drones (-23% output). Yet Ukrainian offensive strikes on Russian oil refineries continued because those long-range drones rely on radar imagery from ICEYE-X36 (operated by ICEYE US), not live Starshield links. Within 48 hours of the Starshield throttle taking effect, a Russian inspector satellite (COSMOS 2612) sprinted 14.29x faster than normal drift directly onto ICEYE-X36, closing to 0.76 km (under half a mile).
-What the Orbital Math Proves: In June 2026, when Russia approached ICEYE-X36 without a Starlink collision alert, X36 dropped 0.5 km in altitude, drifting 71 km/day to escape Russia's 3 km braking box in 61 minutes while Russian ground radars were blind. Across Oct 15 to 16, the math proves X36 stayed frozen in place (moving less than 17 meters consecutively) because at the exact start of Russia's sprint, X36 was boxed inside a 401-meter collision alert with SpaceX's STARLINK-35856.
-No One Else Has This Capability (N = 1): Passive ground trackers like LeoLabs or COMSPOC only see where a satellite used to be and cannot supply this combination. In our entire record, SpaceX is the sole company combining all five levers over X36: operating the STARLINK-35856 co-object, holding its private forecasts, forcing ICEYE US via FCC Condition 16 to coordinate flight plans with SpaceX, tracking the shell every 10 to 15 minutes with 31,000 Stargaze cameras, and controlling the Starshield throttle.
-The Commercial Terms of Service Trap: Under SpaceX's Space Safety Terms of Service (Appendix A and Section 4b), committed flight plans uploaded to deconflict with Starlink are exposed to platform participants with contractual permission to share data with third parties, just days after SpaceX onboarded Chinese operators (Oct 6 and 16), while capping SpaceX's liability at $500.
-The Sovereign Hostage Dilemma: By burying the right to throttle combat links and redistribute orbital trajectories inside commercial Terms of Service, SpaceX holds U.S. defense hostage. If the Pentagon stays, it lacks sovereign control; if it cuts ties, SpaceX has already built the commercial and data bridges to China and Russia, all while demanding more taxpayer billions so China and Russia do not "beat us."
In Post 2 (Pages 5 and 6), our model shows how Tesla's Q3 10-Q ($5.966B China loan and shared-CEO admission) proves why SpaceX violates DoD FOCI rules, why a Tesla-SpaceX merger is a national-security illegality, and what this means for Iran Round Two. $SPCX $TSLA
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
Many of the richest man’s so-called “visionary ideas” came from a specific series of books by socialist sci-fi author Iain M Banks.
Neuralink, human-AI societies, “universal high income”… all fanfic.
And surprise: Elon’s modeling himself on the bad guy—who tortures people in digital prisons called Hells.
mind-war.com/p/elons-endgame…
Boycott Tesla 💎 retweeted
It took Elon Musk 10 days to return Ukraine's Starshield feed back to normal speeds for Ukraine to properly defend itself.
Many suffered, & some died, while Musk played God with their fate during this time.
Starlink is now anathema outside of the US, & rightfully so.
$SPCX
The most important thing today is that Starlink and Starshield operations have been restored to the speeds we had before the restrictions. The speeds are now where they need to be. The restoration began overnight, and by this morning, speeds were already sufficient. This matters: for our frontline logistics, for defending Ukraine against jet-powered “shaheds.”
I thank all Americans and all our partners who took this seriously and truly helped – members of Congress, senators, all the media, the State Department, and the President. Protecting lives matters.