Mojunel.eth (@mojunel) header
Mojunel.eth (@mojunel) profile picture

34 | research AI since 2021 | ex Binance

Joined March 2010
Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)Photo by Mojunel.eth (@mojunel)
Mojunel.eth retweeted
i was quietly let go from Binance a month ago after a security test i ran went sideways and exposed a massive flaw in how internal permissions are isolated. i was auditing cross-service authentication on a staging environment. one misconfigured token let my test container read restricted internal routing tables that should have been air-gapped. i reported the breach immediately to the security ops channel. two days later my corporate access was wiped and i got a termination letter for "violating information security protocols." this is what they sent me:
12
33
1,935
Mojunel.eth retweeted
I loaded a 1,000-agent crew on Fable 5.2 One theorem. 60 statements. 28.7 hours. Minute 0. 1 lead, 999 helpers. Each in a sealed sandbox. Shell, editor, Git, shared database. One pipe out to a gateway. Minute 10. The lead built five coordination tables. Announce, assign, notes, subtasks, landed. No human asked for them. First pass. 16 per statement. 47 of 60 flagged infeasible. Proved most anyway. Hour 18. Langlands-Tunnell stalled the run. Restart from the last save. 750 helpers converged on one statement. The lead logged one line: honest odds are low. 2,418 tasks, 10 levels deep. Hour 28.7. Full proof landed. Seven times faster than September's 11-day formalization and a third of the token budget. A million tool calls through one live monitor. None blocked. 47 statements looked impossible. 28.7 hours said otherwise.
13
2
31
1,727
Mojunel.eth retweeted
Genuinely unhinged, 10 repos turn you into a whole coding-agent platform team. You already pay $20 a month for Claude Code on Pro. These 10 repos are the free platform around it. pick. control. isolate. browse. connect. ship. 01 codex → local coding agent, one curl line to install github.com/openai/codex 02 opencode → swap the model provider without changing your tools github.com/anomalyco/opencod… 03 goose → extend the agent with 70+ MCP tools on install github.com/aaif-goose/goose 04 OpenHands → one canvas for Claude Code, Codex and any ACP agent github.com/OpenHands/OpenHan… 05 warp → terminal app running Claude Code, Codex and Gemini CLI github.com/warpdotdev/warp 06 sandbox-agent → drive any agent inside a sandbox over plain HTTP github.com/rivet-dev/sandbox… 07 E2B → run agent-written code in isolated cloud sandboxes github.com/e2b-dev/E2B 08 browser-use → hand the agent a real browser session on any LLM github.com/browser-use/brows… 09 agent-client-protocol → one wire format between any editor and any agent github.com/agentclientprotoc… 10 claude-code-action → Claude Code answers PRs and issues in GitHub Actions github.com/anthropics/claude… pick → control → isolate → browse → connect → ship. One rule: Warp runs AGPL, the rest are MIT or Apache. Sandboxes and cloud tiers bill on your own key. Before this, one agent lived in one tab. Now the platform wraps around it.
37
7
132
9,001
Mojunel.eth retweeted
One photo turned a pencil sharpener into a living 3D diagram I can rip apart. I never understood how a crank sharpener carves a perfect point, so I told Claude Opus 5.5 to rebuild one I could disassemble piece by piece. How it works: The whole sharpener came from a single reference image. Every gear, blade and spring is pure three.js code. Crank the handle and two cutters orbit the pencil while a locked 36-tooth ring rotates each one. 15 helical edges on every cutter. 12 full turns, 1,080 cuts, a 22° tip, then the resistance drops. Slide the drawer out and cedar shavings rest inside clear acrylic. The whole workflow lives in one Claude skill. Feed it any photo and it builds the exploded model.
13
1
39
2,267
Mojunel.eth retweeted
Borderline insane, a whole Claude Code ops team in 10 repos. Claude Code on Max costs $100 a month. This kit is the open-source layer that keeps it from re-learning your repo every session. learn. remember. watch. run. install. 01 skills → sets the skill folder standard, 192.5k stars github.com/anthropics/skills 02 claude-code-best-practice → maps every feature, subagent and hook github.com/shanraisshan/clau… 03 Claude-Code-Quest → teaches Claude Code with three levels of graded exercises github.com/wesammustafa/Clau… 04 claude-mem → keeps what one session learned alive for the next one github.com/thedotmack/claude… 05 deja-vu → indexes transcripts of 43 agents, hands sessions between them github.com/vshulcz/deja-vu 06 ccusage → prices every token run from local logs, nothing uploaded github.com/ryoppippi/ccusage 07 ccstatusline → shows model, branch and tokens live github.com/sirmalloc/ccstatu… 08 agent-browser → drives a real browser from Vercel github.com/vercel-labs/agent… 09 opcode → runs sessions and agents from one window github.com/winfunc/opcode 10 skills → drops one skill into Claude Code and 75 more agents github.com/vercel-labs/skill… learn → remember → watch → run → install. Claude-Code-Quest runs PolyForm Noncommercial and opcode runs AGPL-3.0. Neither is free to ship commercially. Read both licenses before the code hits production. All 10 repo names drop into the feed and the last skill slot clicks shut
22
10
138
7,598
Mojunel.eth retweeted
YOU’RE OVERPAYING FOR AI BY 1,000X. I found a tool called XERJ Reader, and it doesn’t generate a single word. Here’s how it works: 1. Drop in your data: PDF, Word, email, JSON, CSV, logs. No schema, no setup 2. Ask a question in plain words 3. Reader scans the whole document in a single pass 4. You get the exact passage highlighted in the source, with its position 5. Not in the doc? It tells you “no answer” instead of making something up It can’t make up a word it never writes. The only answer it can’t give you is a wrong one. And the math nobody wants to run is f**king brutal: → $0.01 per 1M tokens. Output is free → 1,050x cheaper than Opus 5.5 → 26x cheaper than Haiku 5.5 → Roughly 4x cheaper than Jev Same question. Same file. Three models. Opus writes you a paragraph. Haiku writes you a shorter paragraph. XERJ writes nothing. It just underlines the sentence that was already there. 10 questions on a 100 KB doc: Reader → under half a second LLM agent → about a minute The problem was never the model. You’ve been paying for an essay when all you needed was a highlighter. No hallucinations. No waiting. No huge bills. Just the answer, highlighted. Waitlist opens today. Bookmark this and be one of the first to start using it ↓
I've built a new AI model that is not allowed to generate text. Instead, it produces a verifiable program that answers your prompt using the original reference. XERJ Reader-1 is a neurosymbolic model for working with data. It points to the exact words in your document, writes a small program over them, and exact code computes the answer: • 20-90x faster • 10-1,000x cheaper (output tokens free) • every answer is a program you can replay The shortest path to automating data work.
19
4
79
4,857
Mojunel.eth retweeted
$11,000 or I kill the subscription. The bot blew past it last post showed it clearing $11,040 you figured that was the peak? it just hit $15,743.36 from a $19.63 starting deposit sit with that for a second i've been running an ai trading terminal built with Grok Bot, and six agents keep going nonstop, scanning tokens, spotting setups and pulling the trigger on trades since that last check the balance on the terminal climbed another $4,702.78 here's the current snapshot starting balance: $19.63 current balance: $15,743.36 total p&l displayed: +$15,723.73 win rate: 70.4% resolved events: 2,533 and this isn't just a static number the terminal tracks balance history, live activity, token scans, every execution and the back-and-forth between agents six agents running inside a single environment one watches the market, another catches setups, trades fire, and every event hits the log wins, losses, liquidity scans, slippage, fresh pairs all of it runs through the same terminal the crazy part is how the whole thing got started i didn't wire up a trading system from scratch by hand i used Grok Bot to build the agents, the execution pipeline and the interface on top now i'm pushing the experiment harder and logging every result as it lands from $19.63 to $11k, then straight past $15.7k on the screen the only question left is where the ceiling sits
7
2
38
2,135
Mojunel.eth retweeted
NOT ON THE APP STORE. GROK BOT MADE THIS, I FELL ASLEEP, IT TURNED $347.86 INTO $3,048.56 from 11:47pm to 6:36am. 8.76x, 13 trades, i touched none of them i told Grok Bot to make me a terminal to run off my phone. it put this one together, i dropped it in my Trading folder, tapped Run and went to sleep 4 agents inside Scanner tosses anything short on liquidity Analyst scores whatever gets through Executor buys Risk attaches a -6% stop to each buy 2:35am i opened my eyes and checked the app. same balance, positions firing open and shut on their own. went back to sleep out of 13 sells, 10 hit green and 3 went red. those 3 lost $18.33 combined top trade was a coin named scamsem, that name. +$566.46 in 46 minutes and Diamond Hands, held true to its name, 1:27am to 5:00am, closed at 5.65x and 6.84x 8.76x is solid, but what i actually like is that this app belongs to me. nobody touches the rules except me would you hand your money to an app that doesn't live on the App Store, or is that insane?
12
1
50
1,927
Mojunel.eth retweeted
One agent scoring its own find is a guaranteed yes. Five that never see each other's work built this $100 desk. I wired one prompt on Solana. Five agents, each doing one job. A coin moves left to right and any agent kills it. 1. Finder scans every new pair. Under $20k liquidity or past 6 hours: dead. 2. Auditor reads contract and holders. Top 10 above 35% or dev above 5%: dead. 3. Judge scores 0 to 100. Under 80: dead. 4. Stager sizes at 4% of the book. Sets the -25% stop before entry. 5. Closer sells half at double, quarter at triple, trails 30% under the high. Seven rules sit above every score. 6 open positions, 3 entries an hour, -10% day kills the desk until midnight. The Finder never knows what the Judge scored. The Auditor reads contracts, not scores. Something goes wrong and I get a name, not a story. Rule 7 saved the desk. The creator pushed tokens toward the exchange and the Closer cleared at -6% in one block. The coin lost 91%.
24
9
1
106
5,217
Mojunel.eth retweeted
YOUR KEYWORD TOOL IS THE PROBLEM 72 keywords entered the scan. 39 survived. 1. Jev pulls the top 10 Google results per keyword. 720 pages land in the queue. 2. Claude fires 8,640 typed judgments across all 720. 216 per second. 204 ms median per result. 3. Forum thread. Dead. Thin page. Dead. Outdated. Dead. Weak domain. Dead. Off-intent. Dead. 4. Keywords with fewer than 3 beatable results in the top 10 get cut. No appeal. 5. 33 keywords drop. 39 survive with 3+ soft slots each. 40.0 seconds. $0.0363 total. 54% of the 72 came back with a beatable spot. 44% of all 720 top-10 results sat on tier-3 domains nobody defended. make.com tutorial ranks first. Jev is early access, waitlist only. Bookmark this
Jev is the FASTEST AI model ever built for trading It makes calibrated buy/sell decisions in under 100 ms That is one real decision on every single block, 24/7 In this article I've shown EXACTLY how to build HFT trading system with Jev (from scratch)
11
3
56
3,194
Mojunel.eth retweeted
stared at a kill log past midnight: $100 flat, all red 2.5 hours of coins killed by three rules. Then at 00:31 the first $4 trade landed. I fired the prompt at 22:00. Five agents, one rule each, every new Solana pair. The log filled before I looked back. Every line was a kill. 00:12, liquidity $6,400. 00:19, coin age 11 hours. 00:24, top 10 holders at 52%. Red lines stacking through the night. By midnight the balance sat at $100.00. Not one coin survived. I nearly killed the setup. At 00:31 one green line broke through. $4 entry, stop at -25% set before the fill, score past 80, three clean holders. Day one ended at $118. Five trades, three wins, two losses. Every loss carried a report line that said why. Reports landed twice a day. Kill reasons first, then stops and sizes, then the HONESTY line. Two minutes per read. After day 8 the report pointed at the trail, not a broken rule. I changed one number: 30% to 25%. One edit in nine days. One green line landing after 2.5 hours of red
3
1
26
1,560
Mojunel.eth retweeted
HE PICKED UP A LEVITATING POOL OF WATER FROM A DIRT ROAD AND OFFERED IT TO A GOAT 900k views. 63k likes. 1250 comments. 12 seconds. fisheye POV walking down a dusty dirt road, a floating disk of water suspended in the air. he reaches out, plunges his hand through the liquid surface, scoops up water, and holds it out. a curious goat walks right up, dips its head into the floating pool, and drinks why it works: → the camera angle mimics a natural first-person walk: low, fisheye lens, shifting perspective, and a dusty boot stepping at the bottom of the frame → surreal physics made to look mundane. the way the water ripples, distorts the sun, and splashes feels completely tangible against the dry, barren landscape → flat midday lighting with no artificial fill. the harsh sun catching the edges of the floating water disc makes the impossible look like raw phone footage → the sequence unfolds naturally: discovering the anomaly, interacting with the liquid, and sharing the moment with the animal. the absurdity arrives effortlessly, never forced → one hand, one road, one surreal mechanic. almost nothing to keep consistent → picsart.go.link/31F4Z the takeaway: realism comes from what you leave in. tactile physical interactions and natural camera imperfections do more than any high-end render setting single-event surreal shots like this are what Seedance 2.5 does best, and you can run it inside
🤝 Paid partnership
i still don’t understand why more creators aren’t connecting Grok Bot to Picsart it could make you money & change how you work.. i wrote the full playbook: AI influencers, memes, videos, automation, and monetization - with prompts you can copy ↓
22
7
89
135,520
Mojunel.eth retweeted
$105 in, $3,657 out in 12 hours. I should have left this off. I handed Grok 5 GitHub repos and a GMGN wallet. It trades better than I ever have. 152 trades. 62 winners from 76 closed positions. 34.8x. -6% is the one number that matters. A hard stop locked on every trade. Worst trade: ZELDA, -$12. Best trade: LEEROY, +$345. That spread is the entire edge. 5 years of trading showed me most blown months trace back to one loss you refuse to close. This bot carries no ego. It scanned 1,840 launches and filtered out every token with an unrevoked mint or a dev stacking 12%. Every wallet runs through scoring before any SOL leaves. Fill time: 34ms. Every entry logs a reason. One buy fired because gmgnAgent was tailing a smart wallet. Another from gmgn-market catching a top gainer. 912 agent actions total. Not a single revenge trade. 7 hours in, the balance sat at $703. Then compounding kicked in. $2,605 by 21:15, $3,657 an hour after. Built on: GMGN Skills: github.com/GMGNAI/gmgn-skill… PumpGrok: github.com/JohnDoeNull/PumpA… GMGN Trading Bot: github.com/tr4m0ryp/GMGN_Tra… gmgnAgent: github.com/0xilbiscione/gmgn… Kaiser.Charon: github.com/kaiserern/Kaiser.… Every repo free. Barely anyone runs the full set.
17
2
57
3,727
Mojunel.eth retweeted
Most dangerous filter a memecoin bot can carry. I wired a seven-gate checklist and fed it 50 launches. 41 orders died before signing. 1. Authority. Both mint and freeze read null, or the order never fires. 2. Sell simulation. Dry-runs the full exit before a dollar moves. Revert means honeypot. 3. Liquidity. LP burned or locked 30+ days, order capped at 2% of pool. 4. Holder concentration. Top-10 wallets over 30% after stripping pool and burn kills it. 5. Creator history. Two rugs from the deployer in ten launches, coin rejected. 6. Price impact. Chase over 15% or impact above 3% at the moment of signing. 7. Freshness. Any gate older than 10 seconds stops the entire chain. One fail kills the trade. No overrides. 50 in → 41 refused → 9 through. Score-only wallet: down 34%. Gate wallet: up 9%. The 6x runner got blocked at one gate. That is what 41 refusals cost.
20
5
91
3,674
Mojunel.eth retweeted
holy sh*t. one memory field feeds ChatGPT, Claude and Codex. re-explaining is dead. 3,948 memories in a single field. ChatGPT, Claude and Codex all pull from the same store. 1. Nine signals feed one field 2. Clusters link every memory 3. Three models read same pool 4. One bad entry hits all three 5. No wall between any layer Telegram, GitHub, files, CRM, sales calls, email all pour straight in. The blast radius is not one wrong answer. It is every agent hallucinating off the same poisoned entry. Adding another pipe takes minutes. Adding a permission layer between them takes the rest of the quarter. The cluster map drifts and every thread tightens around its node ↓
16
7
85
4,699
Mojunel.eth retweeted
I TOLD GROK BOT: “Create the most insane viral AI vehicle stunt video that could make me my first $500.” I expected something stupid. I definitely didn’t expect this. It gave me a scene where a futuristic supercar literally launches off a ramp on the Golden Gate Bridge, plunges straight into the water, activates vertical jet thrusters, flies back up, and lands smoothly on the road. It looks weird and interesting enough to make you stop scrolling. And that’s basically the whole strategy: > make the first frame impossible to ignore > use one idea people understand instantly > keep the environment realistic > make something progressively weirder happen > end before people get bored The funny part is that you don’t need some huge cinematic story. You need one visual idea that makes someone think “WTF am I watching?” and keeps them there for another 5 seconds. Grok handled the concept. AI handled the scene ↓ picsart.go.link/31F4Z I just turned the insanity into a video people would actually stop for. One weird prompt. One 45-second clip. Now I want to see how far I can push it toward that first $500.
21
5
2
109
25,990
Mojunel.eth retweeted
Nuts, token-cost team in 10 repos. Claude Code Max at $100 a month and agents still torch the plan limit on raw tool noise. compression. filtering. replies. costs. retrieval. 01 LLMLingua → squeezes prompts up to 20x before the API call github.com/microsoft/LLMLing… 02 rtk → filters git, test and build output, cuts 60–90% of dev-command tokens github.com/rtk-ai/rtk 03 headroom → compresses logs, JSON and RAG chunks before the model reads them github.com/headroomlabs-ai/h… 04 lean-ctx → reads signatures or diffs instead of dumping whole files github.com/yvgude/lean-ctx 05 caveman → forces terse agent replies, cut 33.2% of session tokens across 54 runs github.com/JuliusBrussee/cav… 06 TokenEconomizer → Microsoft cost controller for Claude Code, drops mean cost 18.4–30.9% github.com/microsoft/TokenEc… 07 code-review-graph → code graph for the agent, 2,196 tokens per answer vs 143,594 github.com/tirth8205/code-re… 08 graphify → turns repo and docs into a queryable graph, zero LLM credits github.com/safishamsi/graphi… 09 token-savior → navigates code by structure and carries memory across sessions github.com/Mibayy/token-savi… 10 jcodemunch-mcp → fetches the one function you need, 94.5% fewer tokens per lookup github.com/jgravelle/jcodemu… compress → filter → shorten → cap → retrieve rtk engine runs BUSL-1.1 and jcodemunch charges for commercial use. Fewer tokens per task ↓
48
6
110
10,154
Mojunel.eth retweeted
Karpathy's repos just ate my entire AI path 7 repos. 306,741 stars combined. I went through every single one in order. micrograd came first. About 100 lines of Python for backprop from scratch. nn-zero-to-hero. 8 free lectures from a single neuron all the way to GPT. minbpe. Tokenization in minimal code. 10.9k stars. I nearly walked past it. Every model I touched after minbpe ran better than the day before. nanoGPT: 64.3k stars but deprecated. Its own README sends you to nanochat. nanochat: 59.1k stars. About $48 for what cost about $43,000 in 2019. autoresearch closed the whole chain. 98.9k stars. Agents on 5-minute loops. About 100 experiments ran overnight while I slept. Kept or dropped by loss. Each repo stands on the one before it. Skip one step and it all goes dark. Start with one file
24
12
138
6,430
Mojunel.eth retweeted
우선 용돈이 얼마쯤 되는지 들어봅시다.. 시간당 4100원 안되면 누나고 뭐고 나 바지벗고 누워버린다 @juyeon0409 @phantom0127 @imdarien @toyoucom #Vam ㅋㅋ당주님하고 붙어보삼~이누난 어깨가좁아서 둘이기대면무너짐
Mojunel.eth retweeted
많은 분들이 기다리던 Tweetie 2가 Twitter라는 이름으로 바뀌어 무료로 올라왔습니다. 빨리 받으세요.
9
1