NHS SAFETY REGULATOR SACKED THE ONE INSPECTOR WHO ACTUALLY DID HIS JOB Here's a fun one for you. The Care Quality Commission exists to catch hospitals doing dangerous things. It is the referee. The body every NHS trust in England has to answer to. So when one of its own inspectors kept flagging genuine safety problems, the CQC @CareQualityComm did the only logical thing a safety regulator can do. It sacked him. Meet Dr Shyam Kumar @ukorthopod, an orthopaedic surgeon who worked part time as a special advisor for the CQC from 2014 to 2019. His job was to help inspect hospitals. Somewhere along the way he made the fatal error of taking that job seriously. From 2015 onwards Kumar raised concern after concern. He said he was expected to simply rubber stamp inspections rather than actually inspect anything. He flagged safety failings at his own trust, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay. He reported bullying and obstruction inside the CQC itself. Nobody acted on any of it. In December 2018 the CQC terminated his contract, accusing him of misconduct including using his position to manipulate colleagues. Three of the four allegations were later quietly dropped. The fourth was a letter he wrote trying to resolve a dispute, which CQC lawyers spent years insisting counted as bullying. It did not. In 2022 the Manchester Employment Tribunal ruled Kumar had been unfairly dismissed and found the safety concerns he raised played a significant part in the decision to get rid of him. He was awarded 23000 pounds. Small price for silencing a problem. The CQC is a legally designated Prescribed Person under whistleblowing law. That means it is officially supposed to be one of the safe places NHS staff can turn to when they are ignored everywhere else. A decade earlier the Mid Staffordshire Public Inquiry had already found the CQC harmed its own whistleblowers. Same organisation. Same pattern. Just a different decade to be embarrassed in. BMA council chair Philip Banfield @TheBMA said it is paramount doctors can raise safety concerns without fear of recrimination or backlash. The CQC's response was to say it accepted the findings and had learnt from the case. It always has learnt. It never seems to remember. Kumar summed it up better than any regulator ever could. He said the whole energy of a few individuals in the CQC was spent gunning him down rather than focusing on patient safety. That is not a rogue department having a bad week. That is the watchdog eating the only person still doing its job.