Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Replying to @DSSebastian1
Iโm told that we must โenforce the law,โ Judge Dredd style, by randos who otherwise look the other way when Trump 2.0 violates countless other laws and disregards countless court orders. Ironically, the law does not require even lawful mass deportations, much less what ICE does.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Shit like this is a huge reason why MAGA got obliterated yesterday. Donโt bitch at me. You know Iโm right.
The Trump administration has plans to deport 200 Afghan nationals first to Pakistan and then to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. These deportees could be persecuted by the Taliban due to connections they or their relatives had to the US war in Afghanistan.ย
cbsnews.com/news/ice-deportaโฆ
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Replying to @greggnunziata
So where are the Reaganesque candidates? It would have been nice if the party had been working on those the last few decades.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Replying to @ConceptualJames
There is no MAGA and Trump is an empty suit.
Good luck starting all over again.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Replying to @ConceptualJames
There's another group. It's not Trumpian. It's Constitutional, social and fiscal conservatives.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
This is a total hoot.
About the only thing it gets correct is that 2024 Trump voters were "pissed." As the polls spell out, very clearly, they were angry about tariffs--a word weirdly not found in this post, but which exit polls showed 65% of voters dislike. There's a straight line between those punishing costs and Senate losses in Kansas, Iowa, Ohio (farm areas) and beyond.
Angry the WH instead spent this past year talking about ballrooms and the Kennedy center. Frustrated by the complete absence of a next-two-year agenda (85% are concerned by healthcare costs. Where is the GOP plan?)
They are also unhappy about the war, though the numbers might be different if the president been clear about an exit strategy. And not sure where the "smartest" (and most anonymous) pollster in the world got the Israel argument. Exit polls show that of the 51% of voters who said our support for Israel was "too strong," only 19% of even that subset of respondents were Republican. The vast majority of GOP voters said our support for Israel was "just right" or "not strong enough."
Amusing to claim the problem here was traditional conservatives, as they were sidelined. Tillis was run out of the party, dooming NC. As was Cornyn. The WH had a pure expression of its second-term Trump/Vance agenda and loyalty in its chosen candidate of Ken Paxton. That would be the smoking carcass sitting on a 12-point loss in. . . Texas of all places. Meanwhile, who exactly is even talking about "asylum"? That's just a smear-y effort to preemptively shut down valid criticism.
The GOP strength has always been in its coalition--free-marketers, defense hawks, cultural conservatives. Trump's first-term success came from largely following that Reagan playbook. The second-term leaned into me-too progressive populism--at the veep's urging--and it ain't working.
The weird thing is that the veep remains more obsessed with remaking the party than with winning. Winning will require a lot better understanding of what happened yesterday than what is on offer in this alternate-universe view.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"โwhether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasnโt sharp enough down the stretch. Iโm sure thatโs true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollsterโone of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday weโd lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (Sheโs also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcementโby focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, โI told you soโ: youโre right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Letโs take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Trump kept the war short of victory to spare himself the political fallout of โescalation.โ The war dragged on, gas prices climbed and voters punished his party.
He got the fallout anyway and never got the terms.
Iran's nuclear program remains unresolved, tankers still pay war-risk premiums to transit the Strait, and he spent months calling that a win.
The calendar was always going to hurt. The presidentโs party usually loses ground in midterms.
But the calendar doesnโt explain Texas and Kansas.
Trump inherited prices that had climbed for years and were never coming back down. The only way out was more supply. Instead, he spent a year announcing, pausing and reimposing sweeping tariffs.
Nobody builds a factory on a rate that changes by the week.
He then layered an oil shock from a war that wouldn't end on top of all that and spent months telling voters the economy was booming.
I warned about this in May, and it wasn't hard to see.
The economy was already limping.
Now itโs being hit by two supply shocks:
Tariffs = Washington making goods more expensive.
Oil = Iran making energy more expensive.
A strong economy might survive one, but a weak, inflation-prone economy may not survive both.
End the self-inflicted wound. Win the war or get destroyed in midterms.
The clock is ticking.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Tariffs and ballrooms and caulking mall pools
Big marble arches encrusted with jewels
Renaming oceans and great lakes and streams
These are a few of my favorite things
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
If a prominent Republican leader had spent the last two years clearly speaking the truth about the state of the GOP under Trump and how it would lead to disaster, he'd look awfully impressive to an awful lot of people tonight. Too bad we don't have anybody like that.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Replying to @CalFreiburger
Thereโs much more ground for impeaching Trump.
Start with the TikTok ban refusal.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Replying to @CalFreiburger
Truly incredible how they rallied around a demented 80 year old 3 times in a row thinking it was a good long term strategy. This is a sequel to 2006, and the 2008 sequel is right around the corner. Theyโre gonna be outta power for at least 8 years
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
This should be MAGAโs political obituary.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
On prices, itโs not just that Trump failed to deliver on his 2024 promise to bring them down, he pursued policies (tariffs, Iran war) that served to increase them across the board.
This was the equivalent of, say, pledging to close down the border and then doing multiple things to make the border more porous.
Then, he either denied his policies were having this effect, promised miraculous relief at some point TBD, or said he didnโt care. And this was the issue that has the most direct impact on peopleโs everyday lives.
So, the scale of the rebuke is stunning, but that there was a rebuke is not surprisingโitโd be hard to do more to elicit just such reaction.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Two (2) of the top four (4) reasons Vance found to blame for the wipeout were related to foreign policy, one of them not even having to do with economic effects but rather diplomatic policy itself.
In exit polls, the parties were nearly split on foreign policy and only 4% said foreign policy was the top issue.
It's delusional.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Hey, I've got a crazy idea for an outside-the-box new direction the GOP could take: responsible competent governance. Worth a shot?
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Kansas went blue because of tariffs.
Tariffs hurt the framers.
Kansas was red in the Senate for 94 years.
Tariffs donโt work.
Blanket tariffs are bad policy.
Donโt institute blanket tariffs.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Also on point
Even more voters said corruption was a top issue than said Iran was. nationalreview.com/corner/raโฆ
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Phil - there is obviously no question โAmericaโ hates it and โvotersโ hate it. But what is most striking, is how much the people hate it who were supposed to be the beneficiaries of it. American manufacturers hate it, working class Americans hate it, and perhaps more than anyone, small business hates it.
A reminder to @oren_cass that America hates your tariff agenda. And this one is from the NBC exit polls:
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
Trump is historically off putting to the electorate. The was always going to be the outcome of a second Trump term.
Calvin Freiburger โ๏ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฆ retweeted
People will overcomplicate it because never has a defeat been more obviously overdetermined. The tariffs - which destroyed Trump's popularity LONG before he started a losing war - are even more important. Equally as important: the flagrant corruption, performative cruelty, and obsession with masturbatory public antics.

































