Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger) header
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger) profile picture

Independent-minded Christian conservative writer longing for a return to sanity, decency, and results on the Right. https://teapawt.net/t.co/YHrDZbiqIL

Wisconsin
Joined January 2012
Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)Photo by Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ (@CalFreiburger)
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Replying to @DSSebastian1
Iโ€™m told that we must โ€œenforce the law,โ€ Judge Dredd style, by randos who otherwise look the other way when Trump 2.0 violates countless other laws and disregards countless court orders. Ironically, the law does not require even lawful mass deportations, much less what ICE does.
4
13
198
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Shit like this is a huge reason why MAGA got obliterated yesterday. Donโ€™t bitch at me. You know Iโ€™m right.
The Trump administration has plans to deport 200 Afghan nationals first to Pakistan and then to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. These deportees could be persecuted by the Taliban due to connections they or their relatives had to the US war in Afghanistan.ย  cbsnews.com/news/ice-deportaโ€ฆ
5
12
55
1,153
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Replying to @greggnunziata
So where are the Reaganesque candidates? It would have been nice if the party had been working on those the last few decades.
1
1
47
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Replying to @ConceptualJames
There is no MAGA and Trump is an empty suit. Good luck starting all over again.
1
3
45
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Replying to @ConceptualJames
There's another group. It's not Trumpian. It's Constitutional, social and fiscal conservatives.
1
1
29
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
This is a total hoot. About the only thing it gets correct is that 2024 Trump voters were "pissed." As the polls spell out, very clearly, they were angry about tariffs--a word weirdly not found in this post, but which exit polls showed 65% of voters dislike. There's a straight line between those punishing costs and Senate losses in Kansas, Iowa, Ohio (farm areas) and beyond. Angry the WH instead spent this past year talking about ballrooms and the Kennedy center. Frustrated by the complete absence of a next-two-year agenda (85% are concerned by healthcare costs. Where is the GOP plan?) They are also unhappy about the war, though the numbers might be different if the president been clear about an exit strategy. And not sure where the "smartest" (and most anonymous) pollster in the world got the Israel argument. Exit polls show that of the 51% of voters who said our support for Israel was "too strong," only 19% of even that subset of respondents were Republican. The vast majority of GOP voters said our support for Israel was "just right" or "not strong enough." Amusing to claim the problem here was traditional conservatives, as they were sidelined. Tillis was run out of the party, dooming NC. As was Cornyn. The WH had a pure expression of its second-term Trump/Vance agenda and loyalty in its chosen candidate of Ken Paxton. That would be the smoking carcass sitting on a 12-point loss in. . . Texas of all places. Meanwhile, who exactly is even talking about "asylum"? That's just a smear-y effort to preemptively shut down valid criticism. The GOP strength has always been in its coalition--free-marketers, defense hawks, cultural conservatives. Trump's first-term success came from largely following that Reagan playbook. The second-term leaned into me-too progressive populism--at the veep's urging--and it ain't working. The weird thing is that the veep remains more obsessed with remaking the party than with winning. Winning will require a lot better understanding of what happened yesterday than what is on offer in this alternate-universe view.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"โ€”whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasnโ€™t sharp enough down the stretch. Iโ€™m sure thatโ€™s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollsterโ€”one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday weโ€™d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (Sheโ€™s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcementโ€”by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, โ€œI told you soโ€: youโ€™re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Letโ€™s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
121
114
23
594
38,950
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Trump kept the war short of victory to spare himself the political fallout of โ€œescalation.โ€ The war dragged on, gas prices climbed and voters punished his party. He got the fallout anyway and never got the terms. Iran's nuclear program remains unresolved, tankers still pay war-risk premiums to transit the Strait, and he spent months calling that a win. The calendar was always going to hurt. The presidentโ€™s party usually loses ground in midterms. But the calendar doesnโ€™t explain Texas and Kansas. Trump inherited prices that had climbed for years and were never coming back down. The only way out was more supply. Instead, he spent a year announcing, pausing and reimposing sweeping tariffs. Nobody builds a factory on a rate that changes by the week. He then layered an oil shock from a war that wouldn't end on top of all that and spent months telling voters the economy was booming. I warned about this in May, and it wasn't hard to see.
The economy was already limping. Now itโ€™s being hit by two supply shocks: Tariffs = Washington making goods more expensive. Oil = Iran making energy more expensive. A strong economy might survive one, but a weak, inflation-prone economy may not survive both. End the self-inflicted wound. Win the war or get destroyed in midterms. The clock is ticking.
7
18
1
54
3,386
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Tariffs and ballrooms and caulking mall pools Big marble arches encrusted with jewels Renaming oceans and great lakes and streams These are a few of my favorite things
As Republicans are grappling with the aftermath of major midterm losses and voter anger, President Trump is talking about how the ballroom will be "the most beautiful in the world."
32
134
7
1,067
19,224
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
If a prominent Republican leader had spent the last two years clearly speaking the truth about the state of the GOP under Trump and how it would lead to disaster, he'd look awfully impressive to an awful lot of people tonight. Too bad we don't have anybody like that.
3
4
112
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Replying to @CalFreiburger
Thereโ€™s much more ground for impeaching Trump. Start with the TikTok ban refusal.
1
6
63
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Replying to @CalFreiburger
Truly incredible how they rallied around a demented 80 year old 3 times in a row thinking it was a good long term strategy. This is a sequel to 2006, and the 2008 sequel is right around the corner. Theyโ€™re gonna be outta power for at least 8 years
1
1
58
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
This should be MAGAโ€™s political obituary.
Last night was the largest blue wave in a generation. Democrats have been projected as winner in 54 Senate seats, flipping seven states and with a lead in two others (Alaska and Mississippi). In the House, Democrats have been projected in 249 seats - a net gain of 38 so far.
11
5
81
1,184
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
On prices, itโ€™s not just that Trump failed to deliver on his 2024 promise to bring them down, he pursued policies (tariffs, Iran war) that served to increase them across the board. This was the equivalent of, say, pledging to close down the border and then doing multiple things to make the border more porous. Then, he either denied his policies were having this effect, promised miraculous relief at some point TBD, or said he didnโ€™t care. And this was the issue that has the most direct impact on peopleโ€™s everyday lives. So, the scale of the rebuke is stunning, but that there was a rebuke is not surprisingโ€”itโ€™d be hard to do more to elicit just such reaction.
29
46
4
249
18,732
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Two (2) of the top four (4) reasons Vance found to blame for the wipeout were related to foreign policy, one of them not even having to do with economic effects but rather diplomatic policy itself. In exit polls, the parties were nearly split on foreign policy and only 4% said foreign policy was the top issue. It's delusional.
25
82
5
425
18,080
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Hey, I've got a crazy idea for an outside-the-box new direction the GOP could take: responsible competent governance. Worth a shot?
6
5
31
434
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Kansas went blue because of tariffs. Tariffs hurt the framers. Kansas was red in the Senate for 94 years. Tariffs donโ€™t work. Blanket tariffs are bad policy. Donโ€™t institute blanket tariffs.
17
94
5
696
12,197
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Phil - there is obviously no question โ€œAmericaโ€ hates it and โ€œvotersโ€ hate it. But what is most striking, is how much the people hate it who were supposed to be the beneficiaries of it. American manufacturers hate it, working class Americans hate it, and perhaps more than anyone, small business hates it.
A reminder to @oren_cass that America hates your tariff agenda. And this one is from the NBC exit polls:
10
73
3
274
14,974
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
Trump is historically off putting to the electorate. The was always going to be the outcome of a second Trump term.
National GOP strategist conspicuously sends me these
2
10
22
1,204
Calvin Freiburger โœ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ retweeted
People will overcomplicate it because never has a defeat been more obviously overdetermined. The tariffs - which destroyed Trump's popularity LONG before he started a losing war - are even more important. Equally as important: the flagrant corruption, performative cruelty, and obsession with masturbatory public antics.
National GOP operative tells me: "People will try to overcomplicate this, but its really simple: This is 100% because of Iran. It's all in the data and has been since a week after the war started. The economic anxiety is directly correlated with the war. We got our asses kicked because of it."
38
129
11
755
29,771