BrewGuy61

For the record, this lays out the basic problem readers have with a dozen or more stories about the Peltola campaign right before an election:

No, it’s fucking not.

LOL. Is destroy the country in a desperate pursuit of unimaginable wealth and unaccountable power on the list? No? Then get fucked.

If it’s nothing new, why is the New York Times treating it like Watergate?

So, in other words, give in to my demands or I’ll engage in an exercise that has no possible effect other than pulling votes from the non-fascist candidate. And you wonder why I hate you motherfuckers. You’re no better than the fascists themselves.

They’re called Never Trumpers. Fool.

There’s also this:

You shouldn’t have been criticizing Hunter Biden’s pardon in the first place. Joe Biden held off until Trump left no doubt Hunter would be subjected to and endless barrage of investigations and prosecution on flimsy, even manufactured, charges.

The need among so many, from the mainstream media to the left, to minimize, rationalize, and wave away the horrific damage this motherfucker has done to our country never ceases to amaze.

Nothing illegal in any of that, and pocket change compared to what Donnie Dingus’ hellspawn are currently stealing from the American people. Pretty rich for a shit-eating moron to whine about “Hunter’s laptop” while living under the Most Corrupt President in American History.

If you honestly think that voting for different parties every two or four years is good politics, you either have no understanding of politics, or no fixed principles regarding what politics should mean.

This is a fucking lie:

I no more threw a tantrum than you provided anything remotely supporting your argument. On the other hand, I showed no court found the 2A to guarantee an individual right to gun ownership until one of the most shameless hack in Supreme Court history pulled it out of his ass.

No thanks. I’ll stick with the text of the amendment and the fact no Supreme Court held it to grant an individual right until one of the most pathetic hacks in the history of American jurisprudence did the bidding of his fellow fanatics.

What relevance do you think these rhetorical flourishes by historical figures have when we’re discussing matters of constitutional law? And what part of “the U.S. Supreme Court didn’t rule that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual’s right to own a gun until 2008” or

We can do dueling quotes until the cows come home, but the fact the Second Amendment did not grant an individual right of gun ownership wasn’t even considered controversial until the gun nuts took it up as a cause in the 1970’s: