Biologist; Bio-Pharma Nerd; Antiviral drugs; Evolutionary and molecular epidemiology; Anthropopressure (drugs,vaccines) on pathogen evolution; @azastrobiology
Arizona
Joined March 2021
- Tweets15.3K
- Following381
- Followers12.6K
- Likes6.8K
Toe Negro retweeted
A Statistical Trick: Classing the Vaccinated as Unvaccinated.
"When they came to you and told you that this was a 'pandemic of the unvaccinated', they misled you and they deceived you. What they did was this: they redefined what being vaccinated was....so you the public said 'Oh my God! All these unvaccinated people are getting infected and hospitalised, I have to run and get a vaccine', you didn't understand that no, those people were literally vaccinated."
@winstonpeters @nzfirst @BrookevanVelden @PetousisH @JaninePaynter @ChrisPenknz @nzfirst @actparty @JudithCollinsMP @JohnBoweActor @P_McCulloughMD @RCR_NZ @voices_nz @mattletiss7 @profnfenton @HatchardMedia @theplatform_nz @SeanPlunket
Please RT
Does she still believe the unvaccinated are spreading the virus? Trust the science and the "experts"
nzherald.co.nz/nz/covid-19-d…
Toe Negro retweeted
When safety testing is skipped and a novel genetic technology is rush injected into two thirds of the worlds population, should we be surprised with a Biopharmaceutical disaster that unfolds over the ensuing years? #courageousdiscourse
Toe Negro retweeted
🚩 NOW - FDA Director Dr. Peter Marks Admits He Accelerated FDA Approval of the Pfizer COVID Vaccine, Possibly to Meet Mandate Timelines
MARKS: "There was an acknowledgement that an approval could allow vaccine mandates to occur...Once you have a licensed vaccine, a mandate could be placed."
COMER: "Did you express your desire to approve the vaccine by August 20th?"
MARKS: "I did."
COMER: "And it was ultimately approved on August 23rd, correct?"
MARKS: "Correct."
COMER: "Just for the record, the military mandate was issued on the 24th. That is interesting timing."
@RepJamesComer @COVIDSelect
Toe Negro retweeted
What did the German regulatory body (Paul Ehrlich Institute) know, in advance, about the Pfizer batches?
German scientists Dr Gerald Dyker and Dr Jorg Matysik looked at the Danish batches from the Schmeling, Danish study and found the following;
For the blue and green batches PEI is involved in the release. However, for the yellow batches (low adverse event group), "it was not considered necessary for PEI to give the green light."
".. they knew that these were harmless batches and no need to test(release)?"
"This would support the suspicion that maybe they are like placebos".
See thread for Brownstone Institute article.
Toe Negro retweeted
New Illusion of Consensus podcast on @X! Recently, journalist @lhfang testified in Congress about how @moderna_tx paid hordes of medical influencers to police online speech criticizing its covid vaccine. I spoke with Lee about his career, free speech & pharma corruption.
Toe Negro retweeted
🤯Excellent video on a lot of Gates, MIT, Harvard, and Epstein's nefarious science connections!
Outstanding work @The_real_LGtBT
Toe Negro retweeted
1/3
Nakahara Study Shows "Vaxed" Heart Works 46% Harder‼️
Dr. Chris Shoemaker on a Zoom type call highlights the importance of the Nakahara study‼️
"The study was on 1000 patients getting pet scans for a variety of health reasons, 2/3 "vaxed" and 1/3 "unvaxed"‼️🙏👇
Toe Negro retweeted
I am a Canadian Virologist with 20 years of experience in diagnostics and molecular epidemiology of infectious diseases. Despite a severe stutter, I've been trying to share and teach scientific truth through the whole COVID pandemic. While I have been sidelined for my stance I used my expertise to confirm the presence of residual plasmid DNA and the adulteration of the COVID-19 modRNA vaccines. Been providing scientific expertise on COVID pro bono since January 2020. Expert witness on several court cases against the mandates and vax injuries. If you feel led, please support my ongoing work.
To donate: buymeacoffee.com/djspeicher
Toe Negro retweeted
CDC says no records supporting COVID statement that "high vaccination coverage in a population reduces the spread of the virus and helps prevent new variants from emerging."
Toe Negro retweeted
Dr. McCullough: “The Vaccines Were Far More Dangerous Than the Illness”
“It’s roughly four to five times MORE LETHAL to take the shot than to just have the infection,” asserts Dr. @P_McCullough.
Take a listen to why he says that is.
Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist who has published more than 1000 publications and over 685 citations in the National Library of Medicine.
Toe Negro retweeted
Universities mandating shots are probably only approving submission of manuscripts favorable to COVID-19 vaccines. Reports of injuries, disabilities, deaths submitted by independent scientists face heavy bias from vaccinated editors/reviewers. Nevertheless truth is coming out.
Toe Negro retweeted
“Myocarditis has become the darling of the anti-vax community. But myocarditis is about 1% of the overall vaccine deaths,” says @JohnBeaudoinSr.
He discovered that in 2021, excess deaths shifted from respiratory deaths to blood and circulatory system issues.
There is where, Beaudoin says, the vaccine deaths are hiding.
“So what people are dying from, they’re dying from ... cardiac stroke, pulmonary embolism, gastrointestinal hemorrhages, aortic arch dissections, more than the respiratory, which went down at the same time.”
Furthermore, Beaudoin says these vaccine-related deaths are, on average, 16 years younger than the average COVID death in 2020.
“What it comes out to is the vaccine kiIIed far more life years from the American public.”
Toe Negro retweeted
🧵 A FAILED PRODUCT FROM THE BEGINNING
Just a reminder that the stated purpose of the Pfizer Covid BNT162b2 (mRNA) vaccine was, according to the TGA's Product Assessment Report,
"Active immunisation to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2, in individuals 16 years of age and older."
When the product failed to do the one thing it was approved to do - which, in the Australian Immunisation Handbook, is called "vaccine failure" - the story changed.
'But, but, it was only ever meant to reduce the severity illness and death!'
Not true. Its stated purpose was prevention of COVID-19 disease.
Don't allow history to be rewritten to suit those who stand to profit from it. The product did not do the thing it was supposed to do. It's a failed product.
tga.gov.au/sites/default/fil…
Toe Negro retweeted
Another flawed covid pregnancy study?
The authors won't let us access even the de-identified data to check it.
Another week, another paper published in a top journal pushing either the notion that covid is especially dangerous for pregnant women and their babies or that vaccinated pregnant women have all-round better outcomes.
This paper pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3826… published in Nature on 24 January makes both claims: babies born to mothers exposed to covid during pregnancy are at greater risk of respiratory distress (RD) than those unexposed, but that covid vaccination during pregnancy reduces the risk of RD in the babies.
Inevitably, the mainstream media gave great prominence to the study, often exaggerating its conclusions.
But numerous researchers like @LawHealthTech @Jikkyleaks raised concerns about the paper including the following questions that they feel should have been answered:
- Why is there no information about mothers vaccinated before pregnancy?
- How many mothers were vaxxed after infection?
- -How many babies received one or more jabs at birth (a common thing in USA now; in California some babies have had as many as three jabs before going home)?
- How many babies had RD from birth versus had RD develop 6-24 hrs after birth?
- How many mothers were given steroids in the 7 days prior to birth?
- What was the average antenatal stay prior to birth (in USA this is often much longer, increasing the risk of nosocomial infection)?
- Why are there so few 'normal' births, and does comparison between 227 and 7 mean the study suffers from the bias of small sample size? (A convenience sample?)
- How many mothers were intubated and therefore included via surrogate consent?
- What accommodations were made for the fact that premature infants, less than 37 weeks, and especially premature, less than 34 weeks, will naturally/commonly show signs of RD irrespective of covid? There seems to be no identification of or correction for this normal observation.-
- What was the premature rate between vaxxed and unvaxxed?
- Why was the key descriptor for severe illness so ridiculously normal? A pregnant woman delivering will often have O2 sats in the low 90s, 94 is par for the course. Why was this boundary condition selected as a singular definer for 'severe covid'? Was this to artificially inflate severe covid numbers?
We have been arguing that papers such as this, which do not make the (suitably anonymised) data publicly available for independent analysis, should not be accepted for publication. In this case the paper has the following “Data Availability’ statement:
The data that support the findings of this study are available under restricted access due to the sensitivity of information and patient confidentiality. The raw data are protected and not available due to data privacy laws. Access to processed deidentified data may be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors.
We made a ‘reasonable request’ to the lead author for access to the de-identified data but, despite a follow-up, have not even received an acknowledgement.
Toe Negro retweeted
This paper by Gao et al. was published on 27 April 2023. We demonstrated this bacterial pneumonia catastrophe in a large report published on 25 October 2021: correlation-canada.org/Morta…
As I said from early 2020, what killed people who contracted "Covid19" was bacterial pneumonia, easily treated with antibiotics. This happens with all severe respiratory infections:
"Secondary bacterial infection of the lung (pneumonia) was extremely common in patients with COVID-19, affecting almost half the patients who required support from mechanical ventilation. By applying machine learning to medical record data, scientists at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine found that secondary bacterial pneumonia that does not resolve was a key driver of death in patients with COVID-19. It may even exceed death rates from the viral infection itself.
The scientists also found evidence that COVID-19 does not cause a "cytokine storm," so often believed to cause death.
The study was recently published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.
"Our study highlights the importance of preventing, looking for and aggressively treating secondary bacterial pneumonia in critically ill patients with severe pneumonia, including those with COVID-19," said senior author Dr. Benjamin Singer, an associate professor of medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and a Northwestern Medicine pulmonary and critical care physician.
The investigators found nearly half of patients with COVID-19 develop a secondary ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia.
"Those who were cured of their secondary pneumonia were likely to live, while those whose pneumonia did not resolve were more likely to die," Singer said. "Our data suggested that the mortality related to the virus itself is relatively low, but other things that happen during the ICU stay, like secondary bacterial pneumonia, offset that."
The study findings also negate the cytokine storm theory, said Singer, also the Lawrence Hicks Professor of Pulmonary Medicine at Feinberg.
"The term 'cytokine storm' means an overwhelming inflammation that drives organ failure in your lungs, your kidneys, your brain and other organs," Singer said. "If that were true, if cytokine storm were underlying the long length of stay we see in patients with COVID-19, we would expect to see frequent transitions to states that are characterized by multi-organ failure. That's not what we saw."
Toe Negro retweeted
Here's a list of concepts whose definition has been changed in a way that facilitates the Covid scam (and in some instances, a prior scam too). Please reply if you have others to add:
- pandemic
- case of disease
- infection
- vaccine
- immune
- dissident
- effective
- science
- disaster
- informed consent
- peer review
- cause of death
- evidence-based
- gain of function
- bioweapon
- spread
A reminder that EVERY material element of the received Covid narrative is false.
Toe Negro retweeted
When Victor died suddenly after his COVID-19 vaccine, his grieving parents began building the Road to Justice by obtaining detailed analysis – even flying his tissues overseas— to gain answers. Here is his newly accepted pre-print. osf.io/preprints/osf/xnr5t
@MakisMD @VigilantFox @drmelissamccann @BrettWeinstein @TuckerCarlson @askrsb @KLVeritas @ScottAtlas_IT @BrianHookerPhD @KenPaxtonTX @woodymatters @SurfsBri @IamBrookJackson @docbiss @Glowey2022 @kwstewart94 @texaslindsay @RebelNewsOnline @RealAndyLeeShow @HighWireTalk @megynkelly @ChristinaPushaw @jordanbpeterson @kksheld @BusyDrT @DiamondandSilk @RMConservative @C19VaxInjured @DrSyedHaider @drbeen_medical @DrSHankMD @JTylerHagen @Nohj_85 @ake2306
My Son Died Suddenly from the Covid 19 Vaccine And Here’s The Evidence:
osf.io/preprints/osf/xnr5t
@JanciToxDoc @DrBalbona @Amothersanthem @marksjulia007 @P_McCulloughMD @FLSurgeonGen @React19org @doctorcole @JanJekielek @julie4butte5 @IamBrookJackson @jathorpmfm @ReniMoonMD
Toe Negro retweeted
This is huge: Statistician @ReginaWatteel says fake data was used to justify mandates. She says the government knew the highest rates of covid were in the vaccinated population, but used fraudulent modeling to scapegoat the unvaccinated.
Toe Negro retweeted
We really need to look into pulse oximetry.
I believe the policy of mass pulse oximetry monitoring itself could easily have been a major contributor to the catastrophe.
1. The crappy devices generally under-read oxygen saturation
2. They generally vary widely so excursions below 94 would be common
3. Many people “run” oxygen sats quite happily at lower rates than previously assumed
4. Fear and anxiety results in peripheral vasoconstriction which will lower peripheral pulse ox readings
5. Any excursions below high 90s would result in fear and anxiety creating a feedback loop of anxiety causing further suboptimal oxygenation and peripheral vasoconstriction
6. We don’t know what ranges of peripheral pulse oximetry readings we used to see during regular respiratory infections as we never measured them systematically at home before
7. In many places s positive covid test plus “sats” below 94 resulted in intubation - subsequently shown to be totally inappropriate, resulting in a near-certainty of death.
But hey-ho, let’s talk about how clever we all are in “uncovering the lab-leak which caused the pandemic” instead”
Total 🤡
